Government Employment

For stuff that is general.
Post Reply
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 58738
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

Post by TheCatt »

Let's do another "don't look it up" poll.

What percent of the workforce do you think works for the federal government? Civilian jobs only (no military)

No cheating, Malcolm.

And, bonus question. Is it more or less than at each of the following decades? (answer per decade): 1950, 1960, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000.

Edited: to clarify for federal only.




Edited By TheCatt on 1415457062
It's not me, it's someone else.
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 56735
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

Post by GORDON »

All levels of government? I would guess.... 15-20%, and we've got to have more now than ever before.
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
Malcolm
Posts: 32040
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 1:04 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Post by Malcolm »

I'll go 1 of every 10 people.

50s: way more than this, gov't wasn't big enough
60s: way more than this, still not big enough
70s: getting closer, lots of new workers needed for idealistic hippie initiatives
80s: getting closer still, due to massive military buildup
90s: somewhere close to now, because we still had cash and no commies to outspend
00s: more workers then than now, because we had seven million bloated "wars" on various abstract concepts and common sense in general AND the cash to fuel them

I presume the economic situation in the past ten years has necessitated a bit of shrinkage.
Diogenes of Sinope: "It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 58738
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

Post by TheCatt »

Ack. I should have clarified: FEDERAL government only.
It's not me, it's someone else.
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 56735
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

Post by GORDON »

TheCatt wrote:Ack. I should have clarified: FEDERAL government only.
Including postal employees? I say 10%.
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 58738
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

Post by TheCatt »

GORDON wrote:
TheCatt wrote:Ack. I should have clarified: FEDERAL government only.
Including postal employees? I say 10%.
From what I can tell, yes, USPS employees count as federal employees.
It's not me, it's someone else.
thibodeaux
Posts: 8121
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 7:32 pm

Post by thibodeaux »

What about military? (I'd say yes, active duty only, no reserves or guard)
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 58738
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

Post by TheCatt »

thibodeaux wrote:What about military? (I'd say yes, active duty only, no reserves or guard)
Civilian only.
It's not me, it's someone else.
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 56735
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

Post by GORDON »

TheCatt wrote:
GORDON wrote:
TheCatt wrote:Ack. I should have clarified: FEDERAL government only.
Including postal employees? I say 10%.
From what I can tell, yes, USPS employees count as federal employees.
There are those who argue that USPS workers don't count, because their budget is somehow not tied to the federal budget (and that is why you can't use the USPS as an example of how the government can bring in record amounts of tax money but can't keep post offices open).

I don't make those arguments, but some do.
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 58738
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

Post by TheCatt »

At any rate... I think I would have guessed 5-10%, and probably higher than any decade except the 90s and 2000s.

Lowest since 1962 in absolute terms.

Image


Lowest since WWII in % terms, around 2% of workers.
Image

Local and state government, however, growing massively:
Image
It's not me, it's someone else.
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 56735
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

Post by GORDON »

So, more people overall, but fewer as a percentage of total population?

And why don't military count? Their checks come from the treasury.




Edited By GORDON on 1415460370
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 58738
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

Post by TheCatt »

GORDON wrote:So, more people overall, but fewer as a percentage of total population?

And why don't military count? Their checks come from the treasury.
Fewest people overall since 1962.

Cuz those aren't the #s aren't included in what the WSJ was counting.
It's not me, it's someone else.
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 56735
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

Post by GORDON »

What the hell were all these federal employees doing in 1962? There was no department of education, NSA, homeland security, etc.
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 58738
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

Post by TheCatt »

GORDON wrote:What the hell were all these federal employees doing in 1962? There was no department of education, NSA, homeland security, etc.
Maybe things like the IRS that have been computerized?

Also, this count does not include federal contractors. So the #s may be misleading.
It's not me, it's someone else.
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 56735
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

Post by GORDON »

Hmmm.
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
thibodeaux
Posts: 8121
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 7:32 pm

Post by thibodeaux »

TheCatt wrote:Also, this count does not include federal contractors. So the #s may be misleading.
My first guess is shenanigans with counting. Like, the janitor in the federal building in 1962 was probably a federal employee, but now he's an employee of a contractor.
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 58738
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

Post by TheCatt »

Here's an estimate around 11 million.
When he added up all the numbers, he found that the true size of the federal government was about 11 million: 1.8 million civil servants, 870,000 postal workers, 1.4 million military personnel, 4.4 million contractors, and 2.5 million grantees

Including active duty military.
It's not me, it's someone else.
Vince
Posts: 8625
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 10:00 pm
Location: In bed with your mom

Post by Vince »

Part of the rise in local government jobs is in part due to federal regulations from my understanding. Some the feds help pay for, but they're still federally created jobs, even if they're being shouldered by the local government.
"... and then I was forced to walk the Trail of Tears." - Elizabeth Warren
Post Reply