October, 2005 is: Post a Creepy Image Month

Malcolm · Post by **Malcolm** » Tue Oct 04, 2005 1:45 pm

Alright, new rule. No posting of V's ex-wives.

Paul · Post by **Paul** » Tue Oct 04, 2005 1:54 pm

I've just been wondering who's going to be the first to post homoerotic furry pr0n.

Post by **GORDON** » Tue Oct 04, 2005 2:17 pm

I've just been wondering who's going to be the first to post homoerotic furry pr0n.

1-2-3-not it.

Paul · Post by **Paul** » Tue Oct 04, 2005 2:30 pm

Not it!

Paul · Post by **Paul** » Tue Oct 04, 2005 3:43 pm

(With linky goodness) Found it while randomly LJ'ing pictures.
Coincidently, he's a Furry. If someone wants to backtrack his posts and see if he's gay, I may be proven a liar.

Edited By Paul on 1128455279

Paul · Post by **Paul** » Tue Oct 04, 2005 4:25 pm

Prolly in Gordo's archive.

More...
These really creep me out.

Malcolm · Post by **Malcolm** » Tue Oct 04, 2005 5:52 pm

I think the Tom at the pulpit may trump all other disturbing images.

Post by **Vince** » Wed Oct 05, 2005 12:53 am

Alright, new rule. No posting of V's ex-wives.

I was wondering when someone would find the body...

Post by **GORDON** » Wed Oct 05, 2005 8:55 am

Paul · Post by **Paul** » Wed Oct 05, 2005 4:41 pm

I think the Tom at the pulpit may trump all other disturbing images.

That bastard perminantly tainted Katie.

Post by **Vince** » Wed Oct 05, 2005 8:11 pm

I think the Tom at the pulpit may trump all other disturbing images.
That bastard perminantly tainted Katie.

What's that about her taint?

Malcolm · Post by **Malcolm** » Wed Oct 05, 2005 9:22 pm

I think the Tom at the pulpit may trump all other disturbing images.
That bastard perminantly tainted Katie.

Well, another kid's future ruined by his parents.

Paul · Post by **Paul** » Thu Oct 06, 2005 3:57 pm

The kid won't be ruined immediatly after birth... because Sceintologists aren't supposed to scream or use pain medication during birth. Screaming evidently traumatizes the baby.

Post by **GORDON** » Thu Oct 06, 2005 4:30 pm

Paul · Post by **Paul** » Thu Oct 06, 2005 4:48 pm

I think the Tom at the pulpit may trump all other disturbing images.

Malcolm · Post by **Malcolm** » Thu Oct 06, 2005 4:51 pm

Tom Cruise preaching about his "religion" is far worse than some pre-teen Clay Aiken fan half-assing a decorative shirt.

Post by **GORDON** » Thu Oct 06, 2005 4:52 pm

I do not find the red diamond to be spooky.

Post by **TPRJones** » Thu Oct 06, 2005 5:10 pm

Tom Cruise preaching about his "religion" is far worse than some pre-teen Clay Aiken fan half-assing a decorative shirt.

The odds are the fan in question is in her late 30s / early 40s. Does that help the creepy factor?

Malcolm · Post by **Malcolm** » Thu Oct 06, 2005 6:02 pm

Tom Cruise preaching about his "religion" is far worse than some pre-teen Clay Aiken fan half-assing a decorative shirt.
The odds are the fan in question is in her late 30s / early 40s. Does that help the creepy factor?

Someone in a pre-mid-life crisis worshipping Clay Aiken STILL doesn't hold a candle to Tom trying to peddle the fact that Scientology has truth to it. Christ, just read the first page of "Dianetics," & you can see what sort of fucked-up level of creepiness it brings to the table.