http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22705551
You just know they dreamed this up during a Baywatch marathon or something.
Scientists Are Pervs
Chest and breast girths, a restricted anthropometric profile, suprasternal notch to nipple distances, and body mass index were measured, and breast mass was estimated.
Literally by hand, no doubt.
Diogenes of Sinope: "It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."
You know, sometimes i think that way... but this time it is just stupid. And their justification that it will provide valuable data for the bra manufacturing industry is just insulting.TheCatt wrote:You're just mad you didn't get funding to do it.
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
I disagree, if the data is detailed enough it could be valuable to those looking at bra materials. Currently most differences in bra sizes don't get into that much detail from a material sciences standpoint, at least according the complaints of my well-endowed friends. Maybe this will help.
"ATTENTION: Customers browsing porn must hold magazines with both hands at all times!"
-
thibodeaux
- Posts: 8121
- Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 7:32 pm
Oh, don't get me wrong, I think it's stupid to be spending tax money on this. But I think that about almost everything the government spends money on.GORDON wrote:I have a crazy thought..... the bra manufacturers can't afford their own R&D?
But even so I wouldn't call the information worthless.
"ATTENTION: Customers browsing porn must hold magazines with both hands at all times!"