Fox News

Post by **Vince** » Mon Apr 24, 2017 8:59 am

At this point I'm undecided on O'rielly. Was never a huge fan, but haven't really seen anything brought forward to make me think this most likely happened the way they did with Ailes. I know Murdoch's kids really hate the conservative leanings of Fox News.

Post by **GORDON** » Thu Apr 27, 2017 10:54 am

Rumor has it his kids are taking over and Fox is going to go far left.

Post by **Leisher** » Thu Apr 27, 2017 11:10 am

GORDON wrote: Rumor has it his kids are taking over and Fox is going to go far left.

That would make all the sense in the world and I'm not being sarcastic.

The far left has shown time and time again that when it comes to finances, they don't have a fucking clue what they're doing or talking about. So yeah, turn the biggest player in news from a right wing network to a left wing network. Brilliant! Bonus points because all the left wing networks are struggling for viewers. CNN has rebounded a bit, but they're still no FOX.

That just means someone else will step up and take over the vacancy left by FOX.

Although, to be fair, the kids could be more centrist, and some right wing nut jobs equate that to being "far left".

Post by **Troy** » Thu Apr 27, 2017 11:28 am

Fox host unfairly required to take a vacation for remarks about woman less offensive than her own father has said in past

Post by **Leisher** » Thu Apr 27, 2017 11:32 am

Troy wrote: Fox host unfairly required to take a vacation for remarks about woman less offensive than her own father has said in past

"Unfairly"?

Her father can say whatever the fuck he wants. A guy at a MSM outlet can't.

Post by **Troy** » Thu Apr 27, 2017 11:57 am

If the sarcasm wasn't obvious: the comments made by both are creepy and bad. You'd hope a father would be questioned more for sexualizing his own daughter, but here we are.

e: Shit - you have daughters. You think it'd be cool if you introduced them to people as: "This is xxxx, and man, if she wasn't my daughter.... "

Post by **TheCatt** » Thu Apr 27, 2017 1:00 pm

Troy wrote: If the sarcasm wasn't obvious: the comments made by both are creepy and bad. You'd hope a father would be questioned more for sexualizing his own daughter, but here we are.

e: Shit - you have daughters. You think it'd be cool if you introduced them to people as: "This is xxxx, and man, if she wasn't my daughter.... "

Did you see the gymnastics post he made? Pretty much the same thing.

Post by **GORDON** » Thu Apr 27, 2017 1:29 pm

I for one am outraged, rocked right to my core.

Post by **Leisher** » Thu Apr 27, 2017 1:39 pm

Troy wrote: If the sarcasm wasn't obvious: the comments made by both are creepy and bad. You'd hope a father would be questioned more for sexualizing his own daughter, but here we are.

e: Shit - you have daughters. You think it'd be cool if you introduced them to people as: "This is xxxx, and man, if she wasn't my daughter.... "

Sarcasm was not obvious. I was just pointing out that Trump's position isn't one where he'd be punished for saying anything, meanwhile the Fox guy is in a position where he'd be punished for saying the wrong thing.

TheCatt wrote: Did you see the gymnastics post he made? Pretty much the same thing.

You beating this dead horse is getting concerning. It's like you're attempting misdirection. It could be the same logic as "He who smelt it, dealt it."

I for one am outraged, rocked right to my core.

I am enjoying this new tactic.

Post by **GORDON** » Thu Apr 27, 2017 1:43 pm

Literally shaking.

Post by **Troy** » Thu Apr 27, 2017 1:50 pm

GORDON wrote: Literally shaking.

Let's find you a safe space, pronto.

Post by **GORDON** » Thu Apr 27, 2017 1:52 pm

I need a therapy animal.

Post by **TheCatt** » Thu Apr 27, 2017 1:58 pm

Leisher wrote:
TheCatt wrote: Did you see the gymnastics post he made? Pretty much the same thing.
You beating this dead horse is getting concerning. It's like you're attempting misdirection. It could be the same logic as "He who smelt it, dealt it."

ALL I WANTED WAS A REACTION, LEISHER. WOULD THAT BE SO HARD?

Post by **Leisher** » Thu Apr 27, 2017 2:03 pm

TheCatt wrote:
Leisher wrote:
TheCatt wrote: Did you see the gymnastics post he made? Pretty much the same thing.
You beating this dead horse is getting concerning. It's like you're attempting misdirection. It could be the same logic as "He who smelt it, dealt it."
ALL I WANTED WAS A REACTION, LEISHER. WOULD THAT BE SO HARD?

I mean, technically you got one.

Post by **TheCatt** » Thu Apr 27, 2017 3:18 pm

Leisher wrote:
TheCatt wrote:
Leisher wrote:

You beating this dead horse is getting concerning. It's like you're attempting misdirection. It could be the same logic as "He who smelt it, dealt it."
ALL I WANTED WAS A REACTION, LEISHER. WOULD THAT BE SO HARD?
I mean, technically you got one.

Not a very satisfying one. Kinda like that time you gave me head. Given all your experience, I expected better.

Post by **GORDON** » Thu Apr 27, 2017 4:01 pm

TheCatt wrote:
Leisher wrote:
TheCatt wrote:
ALL I WANTED WAS A REACTION, LEISHER. WOULD THAT BE SO HARD?
I mean, technically you got one.
Not a very satisfying one. Kinda like that time you gave me head. Given all your experience, I expected better.

I thought the same thing.

Post by **Leisher** » Fri Apr 28, 2017 8:44 pm

If I was gay, I'd definitely only date men, which would eliminate both of you.

Post by **TheCatt** » Fri Apr 28, 2017 9:28 pm

Leisher wrote: If I was gay, I'd definitely only date men, which would eliminate both of you.

Still confused, I see.

Post by **Leisher** » Fri Apr 28, 2017 10:40 pm

Weak.

Malcolm · Post by **Malcolm** » Fri Apr 28, 2017 11:23 pm

Leisher wrote: If I was gay, I'd definitely only date men, which would eliminate both of you.

You'd still bang G and catt, I bet.