Way to buy into the MSM's propaganda. Actually, there was a new study just released earlier this week that showed the MSM's guesses about who Trump supporters are have been mixed in their accuracy.
What? I was referring to the supporters of his I saw frothing at the mouth during the RNC. I was watching Fox Spews, but seeing as how Donnie the Dick has alienated every single media outlet on this planet and probably others, I assume you'll still say the coverage was severely skewed.
Okay, 1) them's fightin' words, and 2) as an anarchist I'm very confused. How in any way is Trump supposed to appeal to any rational anarchist? He's very nearly the embodiment of the intersection of government and business described by "crony capitalism" which goes completely counter to everything anarchism is about.
Boom.
Here, you have gone after Trump with a relentlessness that I've not seen previously.
He keeps providing fodder in a way that no one else has previously, not even Mrs. Bill.
Because he's insane and chaos will ensue upon his election.
He is insane, I'll give you that. Chaos? Eh. Relatively speaking, maybe for a short while it'll be quite psychotic. In terms of classical apocalyptic scenarios, you'd have to hit upon a decent sized chain of psychos starting with the prez and going all the way down to the dude that pushes the big red button before anything Dr. Strangelovey went on. In terms of economics, he wouldn't get a hell of a lot done because Congress would stonewall him every time he tried to renegotiate a treaty or implement regulatory change. However, the real thing is Trump reminds me of this South Park ep...
"IT'S ALL ABOUT ME!!!! THE PARTY IS ALL ABOUT ME!!!!!"
Unlike TV, the pachyderm party-goers haven't quite come to the realization that the man of the hour is a whiny bitch who responds to criticism and adversity with less class and logic Joe Pesci in
Goodfellas. Example: his hilarious claim he'll keep us out of foreign conflicts but he'll destroy ISIS in a month.
It's more simply about what the end game is for the abstainers. Ok, you won't vote, but what's the game plan to fight for the change you want or candidates you want?
I'd like a candidate with a legit chance for whom I could vote. "Legit" means they get official face time in national, televised debates. If they don't, they may as well be fucking invisible. That's going to be a bitch because the election system is rigged and closed to outsiders, and they don't give you the secret password until you suck enough dicks to earn membership. What's more, the gatekeepers seem to be proud of their contraption and see nothing wrong with it.
The end game is to withhold my vote until a non-fucktard comes along. Right now, I essentially have two sides vying for my vote, each of whom says much of the same bullshit in many of the same ways -- including the fantasy that NOT voting for them is tantamount to voting for their opponent. That's an ultimatum rooted in irrational, emotional browbeating.
However, at some point don't you have to attempt to make a change or you're the problem?
I fail to see how I had any impact on election regulations written and rubber stamped long before my birth. Furthermore, the non-voters aren't the problem. The voters are -- the major party whores who see everything in black and white, red and blue. If more people stopped voting for the jack-asses and pachyderms, maybe the shithead candidates and leaders would pay attention. I'd love to see their faces when they're each polling at 10% while "eat a dick, DC" is hovering near 75%.
Diogenes of Sinope: "It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."
I didn't care for how I worded the statement and when I feel like I could be offended by something I wrote, I want to make sure my intent isn't confused.