2016 General Election Thread

For stuff that is general.
Malcolm
Posts: 32040
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 1:04 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Re: 2016 General Election Thread

Post by Malcolm »

What the shit? Is there a drinking game both sides have huge bets on?
Diogenes of Sinope: "It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."
Leisher
Site Admin
Posts: 71814
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 9:17 pm
Contact:

Re: 2016 General Election Thread

Post by Leisher »

Just when you thought it couldn't get more insane...Bernie supporters are going to stage a "fart in" tonight.

This might be the greatest moment in American politics.
“Activism is a way for useless people to feel important, even if the consequences of their activism are counterproductive for those they claim to be helping and damaging to the fabric of society as a whole.” - Dr Thomas Sowell
Malcolm
Posts: 32040
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 1:04 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Re: 2016 General Election Thread

Post by Malcolm »

Lobotomies all around for every RNC and DNC attendee.
Diogenes of Sinope: "It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 56735
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

Re: 2016 General Election Thread

Post by GORDON »

My liberal family is having a public meltdown on facebook. Sanders fans vs. Hillary fans, aunts and uncles telling each other to fuck off, people claiming everyone voting for trump is a fucking bigot and he is going to deport my legal immigrant muslim aunt.... it's funny and sad and funny.
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
Vince
Posts: 8625
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 10:00 pm
Location: In bed with your mom

Re: 2016 General Election Thread

Post by Vince »

I am very entertained by watching people invest so much in people that are all so very small.
"... and then I was forced to walk the Trail of Tears." - Elizabeth Warren
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 56735
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

Re: 2016 General Election Thread

Post by GORDON »

The red on red violence is awesome to watch.
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
Leisher
Site Admin
Posts: 71814
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 9:17 pm
Contact:

Re: 2016 General Election Thread

Post by Leisher »

GORDON wrote:My liberal family is having a public meltdown on facebook. Sanders fans vs. Hillary fans, aunts and uncles telling each other to fuck off, people claiming everyone voting for trump is a fucking bigot and he is going to deport my legal immigrant muslim aunt.... it's funny and sad and funny.
I took great pleasure reading that in the same way I took pleasure watching Bernie win the popular vote in...Vermont or New Hampshire...and then most of the delegates still going to Hillary.
“Activism is a way for useless people to feel important, even if the consequences of their activism are counterproductive for those they claim to be helping and damaging to the fabric of society as a whole.” - Dr Thomas Sowell
Leisher
Site Admin
Posts: 71814
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 9:17 pm
Contact:

Re: 2016 General Election Thread

Post by Leisher »

Dem leaning courts blocking voter ID laws calling them racist.

Because we'd rather people vote illegally over control and direction of the country instead of asking them to take an hour or two out of one of the 365 days a year to get a free state issued ID. Because that would be racist or anti-poor people because...I don't fucking know.
“Activism is a way for useless people to feel important, even if the consequences of their activism are counterproductive for those they claim to be helping and damaging to the fabric of society as a whole.” - Dr Thomas Sowell
Alhazad
Posts: 1263
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 2:55 pm

Re: 2016 General Election Thread

Post by Alhazad »

Leisher wrote:Dem leaning courts blocking voter ID laws calling them racist.

Because we'd rather people vote illegally over control and direction of the country instead of asking them to take an hour or two out of one of the 365 days a year to get a free state issued ID. Because that would be racist or anti-poor people because...I don't fucking know.
It's a stupid law. Stealing extra votes by walking in after a shift change and pretending to be someone else is the feeblest, most retail-level possible way to try and steal an election compared to manipulating absentee ballots or other wholesale methods. It doesn't happen.

Should there be a law that voters need to have IDs? Maybe, if it means that we can get more rural poor into the system and keep track of them. But the furore over stolen elections is false controversy and scaremongering, and it begs a closer look at why else some people in power might think these laws are so important.
We're Back: A Dinosaur's Story
Vince
Posts: 8625
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 10:00 pm
Location: In bed with your mom

Re: 2016 General Election Thread

Post by Vince »

I don't know if it happens or not, but it's obviously easy for it to happen. I'm just the opposite. I have to wonder why people are trying so hard to ensure that people AREN'T required to show ID to vote when they are required to show ID to prevent every other sort of ID fraud. Why do banks do it? Why do airports do it? Why do liquor stores do it? If it's racist to do it to vote, it's racist to do it in those other cases.

People say that the privilege to vote was paid for with the blood of patriots that have fought in all our wars. You'd think that those people would want to ensure the sanctity of that vote.
"... and then I was forced to walk the Trail of Tears." - Elizabeth Warren
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 58739
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

Re: 2016 General Election Thread

Post by TheCatt »

Yeah, voter ID seems pretty bland compared to all the other things in the world that require ID. The courts are insane.
It's not me, it's someone else.
Alhazad
Posts: 1263
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 2:55 pm

Re: 2016 General Election Thread

Post by Alhazad »

Vince wrote:I don't know if it happens or not, but it's obviously easy for it to happen. I'm just the opposite. I have to wonder why people are trying so hard to ensure that people AREN'T required to show ID to vote when they are required to show ID to prevent every other sort of ID fraud. Why do banks do it? Why do airports do it? Why do liquor stores do it? If it's racist to do it to vote, it's racist to do it in those other cases.
You shouldn't need to wonder why people don't want to waste man-hours and taxes on fixing a problem that doesn't exist -- akin to installing the TSA at the voting booth. Other fraud cases have direct benefits -- you get stuff you're not supposed to have. When you steal a second vote, 100% of the time nothing happens.

You would need an organized campaign that encompasses thousands of fraudsters to affect the outcome of an election this way, and such things are already illegal. In addition to being ridiculous, since no way can that many people keep a secret.
We're Back: A Dinosaur's Story
Leisher
Site Admin
Posts: 71814
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 9:17 pm
Contact:

Re: 2016 General Election Thread

Post by Leisher »

It's a stupid law. Stealing extra votes by walking in after a shift change and pretending to be someone else is the feeblest, most retail-level possible way to try and steal an election compared to manipulating absentee ballots or other wholesale methods. It doesn't happen.

Should there be a law that voters need to have IDs? Maybe, if it means that we can get more rural poor into the system and keep track of them. But the furore over stolen elections is false controversy and scaremongering, and it begs a closer look at why else some people in power might think these laws are so important.
While I agree that one person fraudulently voting as someone else isn't stealing a presidential election, both of us are just speculating. Unless we know every instance of voter fraud, voter intimidation, and/or blatant vote manipulation we're just spouting opinion.

I mean voter fraud does happen. A lot. Go dig up our threads on the previous two presidential elections and you'll see a LOT of examples, and more than just 1-2 votes stolen. This is indisputable. Both parties cheat, but one party is caught getting the votes of dead people, illegals, ex-cons, and fraudulent voters more than the other by a wide, wide margin. They also happen to be the party against voter ID laws...

The tactics of the people against these laws bother me as well. They immediately play the race card and also the poor card as a double shame whammy. Thus, if you think someone should show ID at the polls, you're a racist, elitist monster. Great tactic. The problem for them is if someone's brave enough to keep pushing the issue, the anti-ID folks' reasoning crumbles really, really fast.

I mean a state ID is free, so how exactly are the poor prevented from voting? Being poor doesn't seem to stop them from signing up for entitlements or voting. Oh wait, they don't have rides to go get their ID, right? Ignore that public transportation exists, and also pretend that each party doesn't bus their voters around on election day to make they get those votes. You're telling me those parties couldn't organize another bus ride to go get IDs? Sure getting an ID might be inconvenient for the single parent working three jobs, but I'm willing to bet he/she doesn't have the same objection to voter ID laws.

On a very related side note, how the fuck are these folks without IDs living day to day? Do they pay for stuff with cash only? How do they open accounts with banks, utilities, etc.? How do they rent or buy cars? How the fuck do they drive? How do they get insurance? How do they get entitlements (if they do)? An ID is a necessity to live and work within our society.

Back to the topic let's cover how it's racist. It's racist because, and these are actual explanations I've heard, minorities are afraid of the government and they have warrants.

I shouldn't even need to point out how stupid these reasons are, but since we're here: You don't trust the government to give you a free ID, but you trust it enough to vote for who is running it, what its laws are, cash its checks, use its services, etc.? As for the warrants, how about dealing with them? If you have warrants that you're running from, perhaps you're not in a place to pick who should be running the country and your community.

Another tactic used in this debate is to talk about it at the presidential level. This is a smart move because tens of millions of votes are cast and who cares about even 100,000 fraudulent votes, right?

First of all, if those votes are in the right districts in the right states, they can absolutely swing a presidential election. Remember, W won his first election without winning the popular vote. It's not about the number of votes, but where you get your votes. That's how our system works. All it would take is some polling data and a knowledge of the electoral college and you'd know exactly what counties you needed to win to swing a tight presidential election.

Secondly, when you start bringing lower elections into the discussion it becomes a much bigger concern. Fewer votes get cast, and that means fewer fraudulent votes are needed to swing an election. I've seen elections be won by a handful of votes as I'm sure we all have, so in those cases aren't those fraudulent votes a serious concern or do we only care about the presidential elections?
People say that the privilege to vote was paid for with the blood of patriots that have fought in all our wars. You'd think that those people would want to ensure the sanctity of that vote.
That's part of why I take this issue personally.

Legit people had their ability to vote taken away because they show up to vote and are told they've already voted. There is no justification for this ever happening. I personally find this to be very, very troubling. I swore an oath to die if needed defending people's right to vote, and to have some piece of shit take that away from someone in a self serving act gets me pissed off. On this point, I have zero tolerance. If you think it's ok that some people have their vote stolen away from them, then there's no point continuing the conversation because I will never understand that viewpoint.

Please make a logical argument for why nobody should care if their right to vote gets taken away due to voter fraud.

In today's technological driven world, there really is no excuse for every voter to not have an ID, be in a system, and have their votes properly counted. The fact that this all isn't happening makes me believe it's because certain folks want a system that they can manipulate.

Oh, and illegals and ex-cons (the big time felons) can go fuck themselves in regards to voting. If you can't take a damn citizenship test, then you shouldn't have a say in who's running the country. And if you can't stop yourself from hurting, raping, or robbing others I don't really care who you want to see as president.
When you steal a second vote, 100% of the time nothing happens.
We can prove voter fraud happens. Again, it's indisputable. Please prove that no election has ever been affected as a result.
“Activism is a way for useless people to feel important, even if the consequences of their activism are counterproductive for those they claim to be helping and damaging to the fabric of society as a whole.” - Dr Thomas Sowell
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 56735
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

Re: 2016 General Election Thread

Post by GORDON »

The illusion that people's votes count is the ONLY thing that gives folks a feeling that their government works for them. If you chip away from that with leniency for voter fraud, then fuck it all, right?
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
Malcolm
Posts: 32040
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 1:04 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Re: 2016 General Election Thread

Post by Malcolm »

Please make a logical argument for why nobody should care if their right to vote gets taken away due to voter fraud.
The votes that matter in DC are bought and sold on a daily basis.
I mean a state ID is free, so how exactly are the poor prevented from voting?
Because some states are dicks about proving residency.
Diogenes of Sinope: "It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."
Vince
Posts: 8625
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 10:00 pm
Location: In bed with your mom

Re: 2016 General Election Thread

Post by Vince »

Alhazad wrote:You shouldn't need to wonder why people don't want to waste man-hours and taxes on fixing a problem that doesn't exist -- akin to installing the TSA at the voting booth.
As someone that worked in a liquor store, this is an absurd comparison. They spend more time looking you up in the voter log than would be required to check your ID.
"... and then I was forced to walk the Trail of Tears." - Elizabeth Warren
TPRJones
Posts: 13418
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 2:05 pm
Location: Houston
Contact:

Re: 2016 General Election Thread

Post by TPRJones »

Leisher wrote:On a very related side note, how the fuck are these folks without IDs living day to day? Do they pay for stuff with cash only? How do they open accounts with banks, utilities, etc.? How do they rent or buy cars? How the fuck do they drive? How do they get insurance? How do they get entitlements (if they do)? An ID is a necessity to live and work within our society.
I know quite a few people that don't own cars, don't use banks, don't have insurance, etc etc etc. I wouldn't be surprised if a few don't have IDs, either. What you are describing is how necessary an ID is to middle-class living and working within our society. They way poor people live and work is rather different.
Back to the topic let's cover how it's racist. It's racist because, and these are actual explanations I've heard, minorities are afraid of the government and they have warrants.
It's not racist. It's classist. It only looks racist to some people because minorities are poor at a higher rate than whites.
I mean a state ID is free, so how exactly are the poor prevented from voting?
Because some states are dicks about proving residency.
Indeed. The homeless are still citizens who are meant to be able to vote, but it's hard to show two recent utility bills as proof of residence when you don't even have a home.

Plus when you don't have a car and live in a place without public transportation, traveling 20+ miles to the DMV can be a real pain in the ass. Not to mention what you are supposed to do if you work a daily grind job that has no option for time off for that sort of thing. Free only works in this case for this purpose if they also accept applications via mail, which they do not.
"ATTENTION: Customers browsing porn must hold magazines with both hands at all times!"
Malcolm
Posts: 32040
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 1:04 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Re: 2016 General Election Thread

Post by Malcolm »

I'm still trying to figure out how this country encourages people to give a shit about voting and DOESN'T schedule major voting time on a weekend ... you know, when motherfuckers are less likely to be at a job.
Diogenes of Sinope: "It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."
TPRJones
Posts: 13418
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 2:05 pm
Location: Houston
Contact:

Re: 2016 General Election Thread

Post by TPRJones »

Well, the original scheduling was for farmers from the days before there were cars. And of course since most Americans are still farmers and cars don't exist yet, there's no reason to reschedule it.

[video][/video]
"ATTENTION: Customers browsing porn must hold magazines with both hands at all times!"
Malcolm
Posts: 32040
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 1:04 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Re: 2016 General Election Thread

Post by Malcolm »

Just goddamnit.
Diogenes of Sinope: "It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."
Post Reply