Slightly NWS: Pick 1 (1-6 from left)

Malcolm · Post by **Malcolm** » Wed Sep 16, 2015 5:23 pm

TheCatt wrote:
Leisher wrote:Everyone is flawed is some way.

What are we picking? A date? A roll in the hay?
To some extent... sure.

But compare those 6 to these 4 (SFW)

Picture

#1 looks too much like Kristen Stewart. Hell, no.

The more I look at #3, the more evil she seems.

#2 looks like she uses a riding crop.

By process of elimination, #4.

Malcolm · Post by **Malcolm** » Wed Sep 16, 2015 5:25 pm

TheCatt wrote:A harder choice

Off the top of my head, I'm kicking out the ones that weren't smart enough to look into the goddamn camera.

Back row, from left, 1-8: not looking into the camera, look wasted (2), angry (3), or like they love nothing better than crushing balls (7 &

'neath stiletto heels.

9: ok

10-13: look pissed, not looking into the camera, or perhaps taking a shit (12)

14: ok

15-16: not looking into the goddamn camera, how fucking hard is that?

Front row, from left, 1: ok
2: looks wasted
3-7: ok
8-9: Look. Into. The. Fucking. Camera. Pay fucking attention.

Edited By Malcolm on 1442439382

Post by **TPRJones** » Wed Sep 16, 2015 5:26 pm

I bet #2 is the best in bed by far. But then I like to laugh.

Post by **TheCatt** » Wed Sep 16, 2015 5:49 pm

Well, since yall did the VS ones... let's go:

1: Yes
2: Yes
3: No
4: No
5: Maybe
6: Yes
7: No
8: No
9: Yes
10: Yes
11: No
12: no
13: yes
14: yes
15: no
16: yes

Bottom row:
no no yes yes yes no no maybe yes

Post by **TheCatt** » Wed Sep 16, 2015 5:52 pm

Leisher wrote:I went through it and eliminated half of them in a single glance. I told a co-worker if the average woman could watch me go through a list of Victoria's Secret models that way, she instantly develop an eating disorder.

My wife and I are watching Bachelor in Paradise.

Her: Of course people like X, she's hot.
Me: Meh.
Her: What?
Me: She's got a great body, but that face. No. Just no.

I once sat outside class at UNC in spring (20 years ago), and counted attractive versus unattractive chicks. It was 97-3 ugly to attractive. I'm just picky.

I'm strictly picking based on dating. Putting babies in all of them doesn't even need to be stated.

Amazing how the baby thing is such a lower standard.

Post by **Vince** » Fri Sep 18, 2015 12:34 pm

Sunglasses hide a lot of ugly, so I went w/ #5 because of titties.