On facebook you just ruipped someone for this quote:
"The definiton of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results." -Benjamin Franklin
You should simply reply, "Obama 2012."
Hey Leisher
Holy crap that was fast. I literally just posted that.
(They claimed Ben Franklin said it...he didn't.)
I would LOVE to post Obama 2012, but that's my wife's best friend, and she's a ridiculously liberal person. I don't feel like starting a war with her. She knows where I stand.
(They claimed Ben Franklin said it...he didn't.)
I would LOVE to post Obama 2012, but that's my wife's best friend, and she's a ridiculously liberal person. I don't feel like starting a war with her. She knows where I stand.
"Happy slaves are the worst enemies of freedom." - Marie Von Ebner
"It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies..." - Orwell
"It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies..." - Orwell
Wikiquotes says neither one said it.
Link
The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.
Misattributed to various people, including Albert Einstein and Mark Twain. An early occurrence was used as a teaching reference at University of California, Irvine in social science lectures in the later 1960s. Also found in a 1981 text from Narcotics Anonymous.
Link
It's not me, it's someone else.
Go look up the recent discussion I had with Davd Eichenberg on FB if you want to see more hilarious liberal thinking.
"Happy slaves are the worst enemies of freedom." - Marie Von Ebner
"It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies..." - Orwell
"It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies..." - Orwell
See that's the kind of bullshit that pisses me off about Facebook.
It's an innocent, and funny article, yet it makes me look shitty because the writer had fun with the headline. An article that I didn't tell Yahoo to let the world know I read it.
I never gave Yahoo's FB app, which apparently is a thing, permission to post on my behalf. I just looked and ESPN's app, which is apparently a thing, has permission to post on my behalf AND setup calendar events.
Fuck you FB! What brainiac at FB thinks the default settings for security should be none, and be ALL for permissions?
It's an innocent, and funny article, yet it makes me look shitty because the writer had fun with the headline. An article that I didn't tell Yahoo to let the world know I read it.
I never gave Yahoo's FB app, which apparently is a thing, permission to post on my behalf. I just looked and ESPN's app, which is apparently a thing, has permission to post on my behalf AND setup calendar events.
Fuck you FB! What brainiac at FB thinks the default settings for security should be none, and be ALL for permissions?
"Happy slaves are the worst enemies of freedom." - Marie Von Ebner
"It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies..." - Orwell
"It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies..." - Orwell
Yeah, why does every app on FB need permission to do anything on your account? How about just letting me check out your app without me needing to give you access to my entire life?
Whenever I get that warning now, I cancel out. Fuck those apps. If I made one, it wouldn't ask that question, but rather state something like: "This is an app. We are not you, thus we don't need permission to access your photos, post on your wall as you, email your friends, etc. We just want you to to try our product. Thanks!"
Whenever I get that warning now, I cancel out. Fuck those apps. If I made one, it wouldn't ask that question, but rather state something like: "This is an app. We are not you, thus we don't need permission to access your photos, post on your wall as you, email your friends, etc. We just want you to to try our product. Thanks!"
"Happy slaves are the worst enemies of freedom." - Marie Von Ebner
"It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies..." - Orwell
"It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies..." - Orwell
That would be Mark Zuckerberg. He's totally opposed to any sort of online privacy at all. What little optional things you can set on FB currently for a tiny bit of privacy he's done begrudgingly just to make people stop whining. Those options will go away over time.Leisher wrote:What brainiac at FB thinks the default settings for security should be none, and be ALL for permissions?
"ATTENTION: Customers browsing porn must hold magazines with both hands at all times!"
Right around the time people were saying that Facebook was worth $5 billion, I styarted getting email alerts for when people would make posts. I have had email alerts disabled since forever ago. I went back into settings, and email alerts were re-enabled. I re-disabled them, again. I still am getting email alerts.TheCatt wrote:I hate that my facebook feed has somehow gone back to top storeies again.
One would think a $5 billion company with pretty much only one product would be able to not have such a simple function all fucked up.
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
