Page 18 of 20
Olympics
Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2024 1:44 pm
by TheCatt
Can we talk more about the hot women?
Olympics
Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2024 2:41 pm
by GORDON
TheCatt wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 1:44 pm
Can we talk more about the hot women?
Depends on how you define "hot," and "women." Because these days both are up for debate.
Olympics
Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2024 2:42 pm
by TheCatt
Leisher wrote: ↑Mon Jul 29, 2024 9:59 am
They've also apologized for the woke opening ceremony people thought mocked The Last Supper.
Did they apologize for the viewers' ignorance?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/arti ... ealed.html
Olympics
Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2024 3:00 pm
by GORDON
After a moment to contemplate, "undisclosed gender tests" probably remain undisclosed because it would be a dick move to broadcast a person's medical test results. So they have to keep it ambiguous, tell the athlete privately, but tell them to FO.
Even if the person is born with a vag, at some point they learned something was atypical and it's always going to be a dick move (ha) to say, "You know, I bet I could use this to my advantage and beat the ever loving fuck out of some women. I bet there will even be endorsement money."
Olympics
Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2024 4:12 pm
by Leisher
TheCatt wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 2:42 pm
Did they apologize for the viewers' ignorance?
"The customer is always right." To be fair to the viewers though, it might have indeed mocked The Last Supper and the people who put it together could say anything to try and get rid of the anger.
I didn't watch it so I have no idea what it was about. I just knew peeps were mad, but when aren't they?
There was only 1 of the women that I thought, "nah". The picture of the second woman made me audibly say "Holy shit".
[Insert jokes about the dudes and gay stuff.]
Olympics
Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2024 4:20 pm
by TheCatt
Leisher wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 4:12 pm
There was only 1 of the women that I thought, "nah". The picture of the second woman made me audibly say "Holy shit".
Athletic women really are my type. Just watched some women running the 800m and damn many of them were hot. Those abs. ugh.
Olympics
Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2024 5:53 pm
by TheCatt
GORDON wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 12:28 pm
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/artic ... in-yu-ting
Khelif and Lin Yu‑ting of Chinese Taipei (Taiwan) were disqualified from the 2023 women’s world championships with the International Boxing Association president, Umar Kremlev, saying DNA tests had “proved they had XY chromosomes and were thus excluded”. Lin is due to face Uzbekistan’s Sitora Turdibekova in a featherweight bout in Paris on Friday.
So what in the hell is their criteria, that bullshit "low levels of T for 12 months?"
https://amp.theguardian.com/sport/2023/ ... ssociation
I'd like a reputable source, not the IBA.
Olympics
Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2024 6:09 pm
by GORDON
The russian propaganda controversy regarding trans boxing may be a big distraction away from the televised women beating competition.
Olympics
Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2024 7:57 pm
by TheCatt
Olympics
Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2024 8:00 pm
by GORDON
The other XY boxer also beat the hell out of their opponent.
https://www.npr.org/2024/08/02/nx-s1-50 ... lin-yuting
On Friday, Lin emerged victorious in her preliminary-round fight against Uzbekistan’s Sitora Turdibekova, winning 5-0 by unanimous decision but without much fanfare in the crowd.
Olympics
Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2024 8:17 pm
by GORDON
453507547_1269319247844308_769367725072389619_n.jpg
Olympics
Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2024 9:09 pm
by GORDON
TheCatt wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 12:32 pm
China's been identifying people < 2 years old for the Olympics for decades already. These people clearly are not that common.
If it's Swyer Syndrome, XY peeps born with a vagina and appear female until puberty, then it is 1:80000.
https://www.google.com/search?q=how+man ... s-wiz-serp
Which means China has access to 16,000 of them?
If the IOC is allowing it, then in another Olympic cycle or two their entire female team will be thus.
Including their beach volleyball players.
Olympics
Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2024 10:43 pm
by GORDON
453416746_10113300847032979_8561441848398870949_n.jpg
Olympics
Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2024 7:16 am
by TheCatt
GORDON wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 9:09 pm
Including their beach volleyball players.
Well, now I'm upset.
Olympics
Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2024 10:36 am
by TheCatt
Every athlete who plays for a US college should count as a US athlete, and we get their medals. You want to represent your country? Stay home.
Olympics
Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2024 4:10 pm
by GORDON
And.... they.... win. But judging by the dearth of headlines compared to the first couple days, it seems the media would like this whole thing to be forgotten.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/bc-oly-b ... fe862c3ff4
I was hoping the 2 controversial peeps would end up boxing each other after they beat the hell out of all the women.
Olympics
Posted: Sun Aug 04, 2024 8:48 am
by GORDON
Ok.... near as I can tell...... we are ignoring the XY chromosomes, and claiming that genitals determine sex (which for the last 5 years we were told is absolutely not true), and because there is a vagina, and "assigned female at birth," then the entire controversy is right-wing sexism and trans-phobia (but she isb't trans! assigned female at birth!) because all of this is just a case of "slightly high T levels." I've seen "the woman who got beat up apologized" posts on FB. A lot.
Sometimes it is difficult for me to look at the world and not be convinced it has gone absolutely insane. And I don't know what to do about it. And I feel bad my kid has to come up in this world.
Olympics
Posted: Sun Aug 04, 2024 8:59 am
by GORDON
Here is the official IOC response:
https://sports.yahoo.com/paris-olympics ... 19413.html
TLDR: they say the tests should never have been done, the group that did the tests was wack. They never state "athlete does not have XY chromosomes," and whatever is on the passport is the gender the athlete is.
The IOC remains highly corrupt and incompetent, as they have always been.
This isn't a case of "slightly high T."
Olympics
Posted: Sun Aug 04, 2024 5:35 pm
by TheCatt
The reigning world champion dipped at the line in 9.784 to pip Jamaica’s Kishane Thompson (9.789) to the gold medal by just five-thousandths of a second, as the USA’s Fred Kerley claimed bronze in 9.81.
"I went up to Kishane and I was like, 'I'm gonna be honest, I think you had that one'," a beaming Lyles told Eurosport after the race. "I was fully prepared to see his name pop up. and to see my name pop, I'm like, 'goodness gracious, I'm incredible'."
I watched this race live. I thought the Jamaican won. My wife thought the Jamaican won. The announcers thought the Jamaican won.
It was crazy to see Lyles win by so little
Olympics
Posted: Sun Aug 04, 2024 9:08 pm
by Leisher
TheCatt wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 5:53 pm
I'd like a reputable source, not the IBA.
They were reputable enough for the IOC until this very second, which says something. Although, boxing being the most corrupt sport out there says something too.
Did you see the pole vaulter whose dick knocked the bar down? Dude didn't even need to medal and he won.