Page 1 of 3
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 4:23 pm
by Paul


I thought Bane was supposed to bring us Broke Back Batman?
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 7:01 pm
by Vince
Paul wrote:I thought Bane was supposed to bring us Broke Back Batman?
Heheh... I'm geek enough to understand that.
You fucking nerd
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 7:05 pm
by GORDON
Gay cowboy sex.
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 8:35 am
by Paul
GORDON wrote:Gay cowboy sex.
I saw some of that movie for the first time over the weekend, with my wife.
I had a fishing trip planned that day too, that I ended up canceling because we didn't have enough time. She accused me of canceling it because I didn't want her to assume that my brother-in-law and I were going after trouser trout.
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 8:45 am
by Leisher
The Joker is a tough role even without bringing in baggage.
Heath Ledger is going to have to put on the performance of his life to avoid people hating him because of this role.
There's the whole gay cowboy thing, Nicholson's Joker, and the years of comic history.
Good luck to him.
I like that poster. The Joker looks "right" for a homicidal maniac.
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 7:31 pm
by WSGrundy
The writer and director were able to take the scarecrow, one of the gayest comic villains ever and make him cool so I have faith they can get something good out of ledger.
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 7:39 pm
by TheCatt
WSGrundy wrote:The writer and director were able to take the scarecrow, one of the gayest comic villains ever and make him cool so I have faith they can get something good out of ledger.
Still pretty gay.
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 9:54 am
by Paul
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 12:24 pm
by DoctorChaos
No, darling. The cape is all wrong. Remember what happened to ....
I can't remember the rest. Anyone else see The Incredibles
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 12:30 pm
by GORDON
I am concerned about the suit becoming too high tech and becoming its own character like in Batman Forever and Batman and Robin.
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 12:38 pm
by thibodeaux
Iron Man!
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 1:16 pm
by GORDON
Lots of villains... suit getting more high tech... gay cowboy for a nemesis... all bad signs for the next movie.
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 8:42 am
by DoctorChaos
You know, I was thinking. A gay joker sort of fits in with the 60's series. That guy had to be light in the loafers. So then we have an over the top way of dispatching Batman involving an oversized dildo (a la the Flesh Gordon clip, damn you Paul
) or some such shit.
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 9:01 am
by Paul
The studio would get too much flak for making a bad guy gay, as it would obviously mean that Hollywood hates gays and is trying to brainwash people into thinking they're all evil.
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 7:36 pm
by Leisher
Lots of villains
How many? Who?
I really hate how Hollywood thinks more villains equals a better film. Maybe they think it hasn't worked yet, so it's due...
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 8:50 pm
by GORDON
Leisher wrote:Lots of villains
How many? Who?
Considering our newest member...
YOUR MAMA!
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 11:12 pm
by Paul
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 11:46 pm
by GORDON
Hey, remember how the revamped vehicles made Batman and Robin so mch better than the movies that came before?
http://www.mania.com/55062.html
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 4:00 pm
by GORDON
Leisher wrote:Lots of villains
How many? Who?
I really hate how Hollywood thinks more villains equals a better film. Maybe they think it hasn't worked yet, so it's due...
I'd read that somewhere, but just now re-found a link:
http://www.mania.com/55098.html
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 4:10 pm
by Leisher
I guess I'll wait and see how he's used before I bash Hollywood.
Although, I will say this: I honestly think they stuff movies with tons of characters because they simply have no idea how to write a character for more than a few minutes. Character development is a concept completely foreign to Hollywood writers.