Page 1 of 1

Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2004 9:46 pm
by unkbill
I could only watch this first half of it before I was bored to sleep. The second time the wife wished to watch it also. From the beginning, again. It was just one of those bad movie black holes I get sucked into hoping it will get better somewhere down the line and never does.
The most entertaining part of the movie was when a moth made it throu the screen in the window and made me wonder. Thank you moth for entertaining me in my time of need.

Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2004 9:56 pm
by Vince
I enjoyed researching the legend afterwards more than I enjoyed watching the movie.

Posted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 5:50 pm
by Paul
I saw in the theatre with my wife. She liked it, I did not.

I agree with Vince. I spent some enjoyable hours looking up Mothman stuff, which linked to other urban legends and other interesting stuff.

Posted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 8:55 pm
by unkbill
Wow 4 for 4. It is a shame because I thought the story line had great potentual if it had been done better.

Posted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 11:16 pm
by Leisher
It is a shame because I thought the story line had great potentual if it had been done better.


Its been awhile since I've seen it, but I seem to remember feeling the same way.

Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2004 11:18 pm
by Vince
Leisher wrote:
It is a shame because I thought the story line had great potentual if it had been done better.


Its been awhile since I've seen it, but I seem to remember feeling the same way.
If you looked up the legend, you'd see that they did a whole lot more than was already there. The "true story" that inspired the movie more or less consisted of three or four visual sightings of something and a bridge collapsing three years later.

Posted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 10:39 pm
by GORDON
Finally watched it. I was underwhelmed.

Posted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 10:40 pm
by GORDON
Finally watched it. I was underwhelmed.

This thread is broken.




Edited By GORDON on 1271126433