Posted: Wed May 14, 2014 4:07 pm
Point 1.
So you can sue Google for handing out links to things like this and not deleting them? Fuck ... what news could you post online, then? Ah, worry ye not. There's a loophole.
Celebrities are still fair game because gossip websites have to make money, goddamnit.
The E.U.’s Court of Justice, based in Luxembourg and roughly equivalent to the U.S. Supreme Court, embraced the concept in part; it ruled that even though a Spanish newspaper had the right to publish information online about the man’s tax problems, Google had no right to provide links to it if the man objected.
So you can sue Google for handing out links to things like this and not deleting them? Fuck ... what news could you post online, then? Ah, worry ye not. There's a loophole.
The ruling does recognize a different standard for public figures and for data that has scientific or historic value, but when it comes to information about ordinary private citizens, Internet companies often will have to remove links to personal information upon request...
Celebrities are still fair game because gossip websites have to make money, goddamnit.