Welcome to Thunderdome

Posted: **Thu May 02, 2013 4:19 pm**

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22705551

You just know they dreamed this up during a Baywatch marathon or something.

Posted: **Thu May 02, 2013 4:23 pm**

Ridiculous.

Posted: **Thu May 02, 2013 4:27 pm**

You're just mad you didn't get funding to do it.

Posted: **Thu May 02, 2013 4:31 pm**

It's all politics!

Posted: **Thu May 02, 2013 4:39 pm**

Chest and breast girths, a restricted anthropometric profile, suprasternal notch to nipple distances, and body mass index were measured, and breast mass was estimated.

Literally by hand, no doubt.

Posted: **Thu May 02, 2013 4:49 pm**

TheCatt wrote:You're just mad you didn't get funding to do it.

You know, sometimes i think that way... but this time it is just stupid. And their justification that it will provide valuable data for the bra manufacturing industry is just insulting.

Posted: **Thu May 02, 2013 5:26 pm**

I disagree, if the data is detailed enough it could be valuable to those looking at bra materials. Currently most differences in bra sizes don't get into that much detail from a material sciences standpoint, at least according the complaints of my well-endowed friends. Maybe this will help.

Posted: **Thu May 02, 2013 7:19 pm**

I have a crazy thought..... the bra manufacturers can't afford their own R&D?

Posted: **Thu May 02, 2013 7:47 pm**

GORDON wrote:I have a crazy thought..... the bra manufacturers can't afford their own R&D?

Even if they don't need it, you know they're doin' it.

Phrasing, boom!

Posted: **Thu May 02, 2013 7:56 pm**

That's so you.

Posted: **Fri May 03, 2013 9:41 am**

GORDON wrote:I have a crazy thought..... the bra manufacturers can't afford their own R&D?

Oh, don't get me wrong, I think it's stupid to be spending tax money on this. But I think that about almost everything the government spends money on.

But even so I wouldn't call the information worthless.

Welcome to Thunderdome

Scientists Are Pervs