Page 1 of 2
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 3:54 pm
by Leisher
The human Barbie.
Yes, it's a real person.
If you vote no, please explain why. I mean, just out of curiosity, you have to. Even if it's just for the story.
Plus, she's crazy, so there's a strong possibility the sex will be good.
Edited By Leisher on 1397246105
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 3:58 pm
by GORDON
She looks weird.
Sure, I'd hit it, but I would make sure she didn't know my cell phone number or home address or anything until I could ascertain how crazy she actually is. She looks pretty crazy.
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 4:23 pm
by Paul
Normally no.
But desperate times call for desperate measures. Any port in a storm.
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 5:16 pm
by TheCatt
Sure, I mean, it's not a dude, and she's not ugly. Just freaky. And that could be good.
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 5:34 pm
by TPRJones
No thanks. Even when it comes to fuckin' I like a woman with some interesting personality. Plus she looks weird in an unappealing way.
She's pretty much exactly the opposite of what I find attrative. I like 'em short and athletic with dark hair and an angry snarl. Like Michelle Rodriguez.
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 6:28 pm
by Malcolm
While I'm sure that's a real person with real lungs and blood pumping through real veins, I get precisely 0% of that from the photo. Given that's all I know about her, hell goddamn no. She looks like one of those Japanese sex robots that sort of resembles a woman, but the appearance is off just enough to be creepy. I wouldn't be able to shake the feeling she's an artificial fuck doll.
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 6:30 pm
by GORDON
I would try a Japanese sex robot just to see what up. Like you wouldn't.
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 6:33 pm
by Malcolm
GORDON wrote:I would try a Japanese sex robot just to see what up. Like you wouldn't.
They're going to have to get to Blade Runner-era Daryl Hannah levels in order to overcome the strong urge I'd have to go John Connor on it.
EDIT: Check that. Even with that kind of tech, still no. If I'm going to do something that extravagant, I'm not wasting time or resources on, literally, fucking myself.
Edited By Malcolm on 1397255740
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 8:30 pm
by Vince
Looks too lifeless to me. Had enough of that kind of sex with my ex's
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 10:14 pm
by GORDON
Malcolm wrote:GORDON wrote:I would try a Japanese sex robot just to see what up. Like you wouldn't.
They're going to have to get to
Blade Runner-era Daryl Hannah levels in order to overcome the strong urge I'd have to go John Connor on it.
EDIT: Check that. Even with that kind of tech, still no. If I'm going to do something that extravagant, I'm not wasting time or resources on, literally, fucking myself.
Well I never said I would pay for it.
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 11:48 pm
by Malcolm
GORDON wrote:Malcolm wrote:GORDON wrote:I would try a Japanese sex robot just to see what up. Like you wouldn't.
They're going to have to get to Blade Runner-era Daryl Hannah levels in order to overcome the strong urge I'd have to go John Connor on it.
EDIT: Check that. Even with that kind of tech, still no. If I'm going to do something that extravagant, I'm not wasting time or resources on, literally, fucking myself.
Well I never said I would pay for it.
To quote a buddy of mine, "Women always cost you something, but some are considerate enough to let you know how much ahead of time."
*rimshot*
But seriously, even if she had the most awesome personality in the world (which is already difficult to believe, even hypothetically), her physical form puts her somewhere between one of those real dolls and a lifeless mannequin in a storefront window, neither of which I want to dickify. Had she not mangled herself in this way, the story would probably be different.
Edited By Malcolm on 1397274587
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2014 12:19 am
by GORDON
Who wants a personality in a woman? I want to bang it, and when I am not banging it I want to watch TV with it and have it say, "OMG THAT SHOW WAS SO GOOD U HAVE SUCH AWESOME TASTE IN STUFF." It could be a recording that just plays every couple hours.
And that's pretty much it.
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2014 3:20 am
by Cakedaddy
You don't want her to play chess?
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2014 8:09 am
by TheCatt
Without makeup
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2014 2:00 pm
by Malcolm
That's a marked improvement. But I can't tell if she has the serial killer sex doll contacts in her eyes. The picture at the top of this post goddamn near makes her look like someone from here stepped off the screen.
EDIT: I almost want to change my vote, but I can't erase the first pic from my brain.
Edited By Malcolm on 1397325714
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2014 2:07 pm
by Malcolm
Who wants a personality in a woman? I want to bang it, and when I am not banging it I want to watch TV with it and have it say, "OMG THAT SHOW WAS SO GOOD U HAVE SUCH AWESOME TASTE IN STUFF." It could be a recording that just plays every couple hours.
And that's pretty much it.
I'd get bored way too quickly. I'll take arguments and talking back over acquiescence any day.
Only reason I brought up that trait anyway was ... if I'm banging this wannabe plastic person, the first photo says I'm not doing it for the looks. Pretty much everything above the neck on her in it is a deal-breaker.
Edited By Malcolm on 1397326067
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2014 2:32 pm
by GORDON
Malcolm wrote:Who wants a personality in a woman? I want to bang it, and when I am not banging it I want to watch TV with it and have it say, "OMG THAT SHOW WAS SO GOOD U HAVE SUCH AWESOME TASTE IN STUFF." It could be a recording that just plays every couple hours.
And that's pretty much it.
I'd get bored way too quickly. I'll take arguments and talking back over acquiescence any day.
He says that NOW. 
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2014 4:44 pm
by TheCatt
GORDON wrote:Malcolm wrote:
I'd get bored way too quickly. I'll take arguments and talking back over acquiescence any day.
He says that NOW.
His hand is probably pretty acquiescent, so some change would be interesting
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2014 8:42 pm
by Malcolm
GORDON wrote:Malcolm wrote:Who wants a personality in a woman? I want to bang it, and when I am not banging it I want to watch TV with it and have it say, "OMG THAT SHOW WAS SO GOOD U HAVE SUCH AWESOME TASTE IN STUFF." It could be a recording that just plays every couple hours.
And that's pretty much it.
I'd get bored way too quickly. I'll take arguments and talking back over acquiescence any day.
He says that NOW.
Yeah, and I'll continue saying it. Stepford wives and gfs aren't for me.
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2014 8:47 pm
by Malcolm
TheCatt wrote:GORDON wrote:Malcolm wrote:
I'd get bored way too quickly. I'll take arguments and talking back over acquiescence any day.
He says that NOW.
His hand is probably pretty acquiescent, so some change would be interesting
Bah, what do the married know about getting laid.