Welcome to Thunderdome

I'm not allowing a vote for #3, cuz the only vote she gets it to eat a sammich.

4. Whimsical.

I dated a #3 right after my divorce.............. that's when I decided I preferred a little more padding than that.

I was torn between 1, 4, and 5. 4 looks the most fun. 5 looks more attractive, but I hate that haircut. I guess it's changeable. But, still. #1 had that weird lower jaw, which hopefully was just an awkward snap of the photo.

#3 is the only correct answer.

#1 She needs a butcher for those meat curtains.
#2 She's fine, but looks a bit thicker and boring. Also, are her eyes on the sides of her head?
#4 Massive hips and dead eyes.
#5 Terrible haircut and trying too hard.

I'll make my case more in a bit. I need to run to work on some PCs.

Leisher wrote: #1 She needs a butcher for those meat curtains.

Eh.

Leisher wrote: 2 She's fine, but looks a bit thicker and boring. Also, are her eyes on the sides of her head?

Truth

Leisher wrote: #4 Massive hips and dead eyes.

Made to push out babies.

Leisher wrote: #5 Terrible haircut

Amen.

Leisher wrote: #3 is the only correct answer.

If you're a pedophile.

I am not a fan of meat curtains. I know it can be at no fault of their own, but it's not my thing. I do know guys who love them though.

TheCatt wrote: Made to push out babies.

Yep, but is baby making the criteria for those polls? I don't believe so.

TheCatt wrote: If you're a pedophile.

Ha! If the criteria here is having great sex, she's the winner by a mile. The proof is here: RIDICULOUSLY NOT SAFE FOR WORK LINK!!!

My gf said something about "needs to grow pubes, because I don't want any little girls in my bed."

I told her I disagreed, because a patch of public hair is not what makes a woman, a woman. And she had no answer to that.

Leisher wrote: Ha! If the criteria here is having great sex, she's the winner by a mile. The proof is here: RIDICULOUSLY NOT SAFE FOR WORK LINK!!!

Lol. You... recognize her? Are the rest porn stars, too?

TheCatt wrote:

Leisher wrote: Ha! If the criteria here is having great sex, she's the winner by a mile. The proof is here: RIDICULOUSLY NOT SAFE FOR WORK LINK!!!

Lol. You... recognize her? Are the rest porn stars, too?

No idea who the rest are, but she's a name. I didn't know it, but it didn't take me long to find her.

She is not gifted in the boobie department, but that girl would ruin you...based on her skills I've seen displayed. And sometimes, you want a pro.

Leisher wrote: She is not gifted in the boobie department, but that girl would ruin you...based on her skills I've seen displayed. And sometimes, you want a pro.

Fair.

She wouldn't ruin me. I'd ruin her.