That's my point. It's not a free market.
?????
There's literally one league worth a damned.
That's my point. It's not a free market.
?????
There's literally one league worth a damned.
Explain how you think a corporation has to hire someone they don't want to hire.
Point being, the NFL doesn't want them, but you think they MUST hire them. Why? Do we force other corporations to do the same??????
That's opinion, not fact. Several ballers have gone to Europe and China prior to and after NBA careers. Manziel and Clarett both went to the CFL.There's literally one league worth a damned.
Gotcha. No, I'm saying the NBA teams / NFL teams don't even get a chance to hire people. And the NBA clearly would based on when they did allow it.
Ok, but it's THEIR rules. Literally they made them. Players don't have to go to college.
But they do restrict the scholarships, payments, etc. I'm just saying, why not a free market all around?
As I linked evidence to in the other thread where we're discussing this, most colleges lose money on sports. Now you want players to get paid, and more than likely, most will be busts and cost colleges even more in lost money?
It's seriously a 3 week extension beyond what they already do, I don't understand why that's such a big deal to you?
Probably, since their welfare is socialized by the more successful. That's not a free market.
Explain your three week extension.
How is a free education in exchange for playing a child's game welfare? Last time I checked the players could choose any school (meaning different levels of compensation), could choose to go pro, or could choose to not play.Probably, since their welfare is socialized by the more successful. That's not a free market.
People have until the end of May to come back from the NBA Draft. The NBA Draft is June 21st.
Then you never will see it. Having multiple choices doesn't mean a free market. Look at broadband.
For basketball, those kids can join the G league and skip college completely. They can go make millions in Europe and China. Fuck them.
No, because I'm not an economist, I'm a realist.
I'm fine with all my sentences.
Can they go to the NBA and play? Yes, or no? No. The end.
A monpolistic company.
Yes. the G League is the NBA. The end.
They're not a monopoly. The G League, AAU, ABA, Europe, China, etc.
Not the NBA.The maximum regular salary in the G League was around $26,000
Monopolistic.
So go to Europe. The G League is a stepping stone and developmental league for the NBA. Same as single, double, and triple A baseball teams. Ditto for lower level hockey teams.
"ish".
Essentially, you can't force people who aren't in your club to pay your club's fees to further your club's agenda.The justices struck down an Illinois law that required non-union workers to pay fees that go to collective bargaining.
I'm torn. They already decided in 1977 that non members didn't have to pay for pieces of the union, which feels fair. The non members certainly receive benefits from the members, due to collective bargaining, etc. I felt the previous ruling was fairer, and that there is no perfect solution.