Page 13 of 20

Re: Hillary 2016

Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2016 9:05 pm
by TheCatt
Lord of the Rings Extended Edition?

Re: Hillary 2016

Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2016 9:55 pm
by Malcolm
Federal pigs protect federal interests. Is this shocking?

Re: Hillary 2016

Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2016 8:13 am
by Vince
The more I think about Comey's presser, the stranger it is. He counts off a long laundry list of lies Hillary told. He states that they would not recommend charges being filed. He then states that if anyone else does this in the future, they very well might bring charges against THAT individual (implying that she did in fact break the law contrary to all the MSM articles stating otherwise). It's like he went out of his way to tell everyone that she was being treating special in this instance. Just very strange.

Re: Hillary 2016

Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2016 10:09 am
by Leisher
John Fund from the National Review weighs in with questions that probably would have been asked if Comey had taken questions after his bullshit statement.

Re: Hillary 2016

Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2016 10:15 am
by Leisher
Another judge weighs in and slams Comey.

It's really difficult for anyone to argue against what these folks are saying. Comey, literally, listed off all the things Clinton and her staffers did that were illegal and unethical, then said we recommend no charges, and ran off without taking questions.

Re: Hillary 2016

Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2016 11:45 am
by Malcolm
Even the FBI doesn't want to give Trump any help. Ha.

Re: Hillary 2016

Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2016 11:49 am
by Leisher
Malcolm wrote:Even the FBI doesn't want to give Trump any help. Ha.
It's not just Trump. If Clinton got arrested, Bernie would be the Dem nominee. As much as Republicans don't want Trump, the Dems don't want Bernie.

Keep in mind the FBI is still investigating the Clinton Foundation. I look forward to hearing about all the crimes Bill and HIllary should be given a pass for there as well.

Re: Hillary 2016

Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2016 11:53 am
by Malcolm
Bernie did better against Donnie Dickless in the polls than Mrs. Bill. They know they'd lose Congress in about 4 years, though.

Re: Hillary 2016

Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2016 12:53 pm
by Vince
Malcolm wrote:Even the FBI doesn't want to give Trump any help. Ha.
Hillary being his opponent is the best thing Trump has going for him. And vice-versa. Not sure out of 270 million people how our political system coughed up these to hairballs.

Re: Hillary 2016

Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2016 1:12 pm
by Malcolm
Vince wrote:
Malcolm wrote:Even the FBI doesn't want to give Trump any help. Ha.
Hillary being his opponent is the best thing Trump has going for him. And vice-versa. Not sure out of 270 million people how our political system coughed up these to hairballs.
1) It's a quite rigged two-party system.

2) #1 is a product of the vast majority of the voting public being as shortsighted, selfish, and stupid.

Re: Hillary 2016

Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2016 1:54 pm
by Leisher
Malcolm wrote:Bernie did better against Donnie Dickless in the polls than Mrs. Bill. They know they'd lose Congress in about 4 years, though.
You missed my point. Bernie did good, yes, but the Dems (the ones that run the party) don't want him around.

Re: Hillary 2016

Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2016 2:41 pm
by Malcolm
Malcolm wrote:1) It's a quite rigged two-party system.
Just a bit.
Ohio law requires groups seeking minor-party status to file a petition signed by a certain number of registered voters, roughly 30,600 signatures this year.

“We didn’t have the resources, the time or the money to do this this year,” said Aaron Keith Harris, a spokesman for the Libertarian Party of Ohio.

Re: Hillary 2016

Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2016 4:03 pm
by Vince
The more I look at this, the more I think Cumey actually did Trump a solid. If Hillary got indicted before the Democrat Convention, they could (and if polls indicated a serious hit probably would) replace her on the ticket. If they replaced her with someone even semi-likable, then Trump would be done. It's surprising how the press is even on this. The WaPo of all places was calling for a release of everything the FBI had. Short of an indictment which might get her nomination pulled, this is pretty damaging if the press stays on it.

Re: Hillary 2016

Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2016 12:56 pm
by Vince
When was the last time a principle person of interest in an FBI investigation was interviewed without the interview being recorded or otherwise transcribed? It's becoming quite obvious that this decision happened above Comey's pay grade.

Re: Hillary 2016

Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2016 1:20 pm
by Alhazad
Malcolm wrote:2) #1 is a product of the vast majority of the voting public being as shortsighted, selfish, and stupid.
The people have spoken, and we don't want democracy. We want dynasties. It's so obvious that the wife of a former kingpresident would be the most qualified candidate that I shouldn't even have to say it.

Re: Hillary 2016

Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2016 1:27 pm
by Malcolm
We want dynasties.
Jeb Bush lost that bet.

Re: Hillary 2016

Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2016 1:34 pm
by Alhazad
Malcolm wrote:
We want dynasties.
Jeb Bush lost that bet.
Trump's a bigger dynasty. Has land and castles and everything. Lots of wives and heirs, too.

Re: Hillary 2016

Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2016 7:43 pm
by Vince
Kind of funny that one of Comey's defenses of Hillary today was that he didn't think she was criminal, just stupid.

Re: Hillary 2016

Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2016 9:22 pm
by Malcolm
Meanwhile, Julian Assange is still holed up in an embassy and Eddie Snowy is sitting in Russia.

Re: Hillary 2016

Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2016 9:29 pm
by TheCatt
Snowy can diaf.