Welcome to Thunderdome

TheCatt wrote: ↑Fri Jun 16, 2023 10:20 am

GORDON wrote: ↑Fri Jun 16, 2023 10:17 am I'm not an animal fucker, but it has always seemed strange to me that it's ok to eat them, or just kill them for fun, but you better not stick your dick in one, or allow it to stuck its dick in you.

Well, in your case, it's because eating it is a one time thing, whereas the sex is an endless cycle of disappointment.

Credit where its due, this was a hilarious line.

Back to the article, is the bolded part because he didn't care about the collie's pleasure?

Themis Matsoukas, 64, was charged Tuesday in Huntingdon County, Pennsylvania, with open lewdness, indecent exposure, sexual intercourse with an animal, cruelty to animals and disorderly conduct, the Centre Daily Times reported.

I've given it some thought, and I'd bet a dollar that if they could communicate, almost every cow would rather get fucked by a human, than killed and eaten by a human. So our laws regarding such things are..... more puritanism?

And what about a male dog that willingly mounts a female human? How's that cruel to an animal?

Name a living thing that doesn't get eaten at the end of its life cycle. It may be dead before the feast begins, but that feast does happen. Still, you're probably right about the cows. Plus, I don't think even the largest penis is equipped to make a cow even notice...

I think they're saying the male dogs were entrapped.

GORDON wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2023 5:01 pm I've given it some thought, and I'd bet a dollar that if they could communicate, almost every cow would rather get fucked by a human, than killed and eaten by a human. So our laws regarding such things are..... more puritanism?

And what about a male dog that willingly mounts a female human? How's that cruel to an animal?

I really don't want to give this any thought.

Yeah but not wanting to think about the cruel and unusual punishment for the so-called crime bears thinking about.

I hate being on this side of the argument, but know what? I'm a grown-ass adult and I want the freedom to.... you know.... even if I find the act repulsive right at this moment. I don't like "thou shalt not." Same reason I'm for drug legalization. I'll never use the hard stuff, but I like having the freedom to do so, if I choose.

How many FBI watchlists are you trying to be on?

All of them, probably, since "freedom and privacy" is the opposite of what they do.

Are you happy you have a nanny ready to scold you and say "thou shalt not," about a lot of things?

GORDON wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2023 9:31 pm Are you happy you have a nanny ready to scold you and say "thou shalt not," about a lot of things?

The nanny just doesn't... interfere with anything I'm trying to do.

Well, I'd like to go > 100 on the interstates more often.

I don't want to argue pro-this topic any more.

I don't subjective morality, and I don't like being told what to do.

https://hitchhikers.fandom.com/wiki/Ame ... escription

If only...

GORDON wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2023 7:52 pm I don't like "thou shalt not."

Freedom and not living in a nanny state I support. However, my support ends when someone or something else is hurt by your actions.

You've got to prove for me that being fucked hurts less than being killed and eaten, or eaten alive (which some things are), or just killed for sport. That's the entirety of my point. If one is ok, it is ludicrous to say the less extreme thing isn't ok.

Discuss.

That's a very fucked up question, but honestly fair. Who are we to deny the dying 13 year old?

However, an adult is a no go. The only way I'd be ok with that is if the adult accepted the terms that post sex with the child he or she would be executed. Kind of like how we have to kill a bear once it tastes human blood.

I always would take blatant prostitution off the table, if possible. Pretty sure we can find a 13-17 year old willing to do the deed. Teenage boys will fuck couch cushions...

Leisher wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 11:37 am However, an adult is a no go. The only way I'd be ok with that is if the adult accepted the terms that post sex with the child he or she would be executed. Kind of like how we have to kill a bear once it tastes human blood.

Well, assuming this is a boy, who wants a girl. You think we can find a 13-17 age girl?

I fully stand by what I said. It's based on empirical evidence we have about human nature. It is logical and the execution could be very humane. You could even avoid the execution if you build and then banish them to the pedo island nation concept I've discussed on here multiple times.

TheCatt wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 11:40 am You think we can find a 13-17 age girl?

Honestly, yeah.

Worst case scenario we tie in some incentive like college credits or a scholarship, but I don't think cash should be the go to answer. It just makes the whole thing ugly and sends the wrong message. It also encourages abuse.

Perfect job for the articulated sex bot with the ChatGPT brain.

For the children.

So, an argument can be made that if the 13 yo boy in our example can have sex, the. It's not pedophilia, it's the other term.. hebephiblia? So should the escort be treated as a pedophile?

What if we told the prostitute that the boy had a disease that mad him look younger, but he's actually 18?

Gordon is correct that within 50 years this will probably be a very outdated argument.

TheCatt wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 12:40 pm So, an argument can be made that if the 13 yo boy in our example can have sex, the. It's not pedophilia, it's the other term.. hebephiblia? So should the escort be treated as a pedophile?

Yes. Serial killers, assassins, and drunk drivers are all still murderers, just with different names.

TheCatt wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 12:40 pm What if we told the prostitute that the boy had a disease that mad him look younger, but he's actually 18?

Again, let's avoid straight up prostitution if we can. Also, I really do not think there's a need to get any adult involved as I stated previously.