Page 7 of 8

Posted: Mon Apr 22, 2013 2:42 pm
by Malcolm
T-shirts dangerous enough to make students get sent home.

Posted: Mon Apr 22, 2013 2:44 pm
by GORDON
Logan police arrested Marcum at the school last Thursday after he refused the teacher's order.


Good stuff.

Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 9:35 pm
by GORDON
Someone put up a pro-second amendment billboard in Colorado...

... and some people are really pissed about it because the truth is embarrassing and inconvenient.

http://www.denverpost.com/breakin....llboard

Posted: Wed May 08, 2013 2:54 pm
by Malcolm
Guns deaths decidedly down over the past 2 decades.

Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 1:20 pm
by Malcolm
Kid's dad about as worthless as his mom.
“You can’t get any more evil,” he told The New Yorker.

“How much do I beat up on myself about the fact that he’s my son? A lot,” he added.

Lanza, a vice president for GE Energy Financial Services who divorced Adam’s mom Nancy in 2009, revealed he hadn’t seen his child for two years before the shocking shooting.

Posted: Mon Dec 15, 2014 2:30 pm
by Malcolm
Suing the gun makers.
The 40-page lawsuit calls the Bushmaster AR-15 used in the attacks a “military weapon” that was marketed to civilians, despite “no evidence that semiautomatic rifles are … necessary for legitimate self-defense by law-abiding citizens.”

The Bushmaster X-15 that Lanza used to carry out the attack was designed for mass-casualty assaults, the suit alleges, and is “essentially indistinguishable” from the military model, the M16. The manufacturer and sellers should have known about the “unreasonably high risk” the gun would be used in a mass shooting of that kind, the suit says.

Posted: Mon Dec 15, 2014 3:30 pm
by Leisher
It'll fail like all the rest. Just a massive waste of time and money.

If your kid got run over by a drunk driver do you sue Ford? How about Budweiser?

Posted: Mon Dec 15, 2014 3:53 pm
by Vince
As far as these idiots thinking you don't use an AR 15 for hunting, I'm getting a 10 round mag and a scope for mine so the wife can hunt w/ my 243 next year.

Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2014 4:19 pm
by thibodeaux
The the Liberals (whoever I don't even care) are circulating some stats about 200 "school shootings" since Newtown. Fuck it, call me racist: a bunch of these are at "historically black" colleges, or mostly black inner-city high schools, and it's not "school shootings" where some guy comes into kindergarten with a rifle and blows the kiddies away, it's some gangster caps another gangster in the parking lot of the football stadium.

Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2014 4:23 pm
by Leisher
I know what you're talking about Thib. I saw the same report or graphic (however it was presented) and it was widely discredited. They included ANY incident with a firearm that occurred within or even near a school. Even if nobody involved in the incident was a student, teacher, or worker at the school.

And when I say "near", I mean within a few miles.

Propaganda.

Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2014 4:31 pm
by Vince
I saw that as well. One was a domestic thing where a teacher was filing for divorce and her husband showed up and killed her at work. Like this wouldn't have happened except she was at a school?

Stupid.

Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2014 5:31 pm
by Malcolm
Like this wouldn't have happened except she was at a school?

Shitty hours + low pay = marital tension.

Posted: Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:23 pm
by Malcolm
Most likely looking at lethal injection.

Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2015 1:19 pm
by Malcolm
Malcolm wrote:Most likely looking at lethal injection.
One juror kept him from getting killed.

Re: Newton

Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 1:32 pm
by Malcolm
Now that everyone who sued the cinema company lost, the organization wants their $700K back.
Earlier this month, lawyers for the theater company told a judge they needed the money to cover the costs of preserving evidence, copying records, travel and other expenses stemming from the lawsuit, the Associated Press reports. The attorneys filed a "bill of costs" totaling $699,187.13, according to the Denver Post.

The judge did not immediately make a ruling on the request, but state courts allow the winner of the court case to recover legal fees, the AP reports.
I'm betting the blood-sucking ambulance chasers that convinced the families to file suit neglected to mention this detail.

Re: Newton

Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 2:30 pm
by TPRJones
Cinemark's request – filed in Arapahoe County District Court, according to the Post – has sparked outrage, with many taking to social media to condemn the theater company.
I condemn those condemners.

Maybe before these families filed a shitty lawsuit they should have considered the consequences. Why should Cinemark have to pay for their idiocy?

Re: Newton

Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 5:18 pm
by TheCatt
Yeah, that was a stupid lawsuit to begin with, but I'm guessing their lawyers talked them into it. I say make their lawyers pay, since they should have provided better advice to their clients.

Re: Newton

Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 5:49 pm
by Malcolm
TheCatt wrote:Yeah, that was a stupid lawsuit to begin with, but I'm guessing their lawyers talked them into it. I say make their lawyers pay, since they should have provided better advice to their clients.
Hah. I bet their lawyers have all the proper forms signed that protect them against any legal repercussions.

Re: Newton

Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2016 7:49 pm
by Malcolm
Malcolm wrote:
TheCatt wrote:Yeah, that was a stupid lawsuit to begin with, but I'm guessing their lawyers talked them into it. I say make their lawyers pay, since they should have provided better advice to their clients.
Hah. I bet their lawyers have all the proper forms signed that protect them against any legal repercussions.
Ouch.
The plaintiffs and their attorneys all seemed to agree. They decided on a split of $30,000 each to the three most critically injured survivors. The remaining 38 plaintiffs would equally share the remaining $60,000.

Attorneys with Cinemark drafted a news release to distribute the next day.

Then one plaintiff rejected the deal.
That's bad because of this.
The deal came with an implied threat: If the survivors rejected the deal, moved forward with their case and lost, under Colorado law, they would be responsible for the astronomical court fees accumulated by Cinemark.
Everyone except four people jumped ship.
Four plaintiffs remained on the case the next day, June 24, when Jackson handed down the order that Cinemark was not liable for the damages.

The court costs in the state case were $699,000. The costs in the federal case are expected to be far more.

"A blind guy in a dark alley could have seen (the state verdict) coming," Hardman, Weaver's attorney, said.

Re: Newton

Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2016 7:54 pm
by GORDON
Well.........

That's the way it goes. I also don't feel the theater was liable.