Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 3:51 pm
Article.
Really? They want credit for that? They blame the Republicans and Bush for the Wall Street bailouts, but the auto industry was all them, huh?
If they had that kind of power when Bush was in office, then they need to stop blaming Bush for everything. Sort of like how they have an overwhelming majority now, yet when they can't get anything done they blame "The Party of No".
I know the world is filled with morons, but it still amazes me that people buy into this kind of political posturing.
Also...
1. They didn't have shit to do with Ford's turnaround.
2. They still own 60% of GM despite their assurances they would sell as soon as the company was on the right track.
P.S. I found it interesting that the date the bailout was actually approved and passed was buried in the article.
Edited By Leisher on 1282679519
Really? They want credit for that? They blame the Republicans and Bush for the Wall Street bailouts, but the auto industry was all them, huh?
If they had that kind of power when Bush was in office, then they need to stop blaming Bush for everything. Sort of like how they have an overwhelming majority now, yet when they can't get anything done they blame "The Party of No".
I know the world is filled with morons, but it still amazes me that people buy into this kind of political posturing.
Also...
1. They didn't have shit to do with Ford's turnaround.
2. They still own 60% of GM despite their assurances they would sell as soon as the company was on the right track.
P.S. I found it interesting that the date the bailout was actually approved and passed was buried in the article.
Edited By Leisher on 1282679519