Page 4 of 9

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2015 2:34 pm
by GORDON
3rd trailer, tons of new shit. May want to not watch this.... as usual, I feel like they are giving away too much.

<object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" style="width:560px; height:315px;" data="">
<param name="movie" value="" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" />
</object>

I am concerned this movie cannot reach the level of fun that the first one did.... but this trailer boosts my confidence a bit.

Especially the last second.




Edited By GORDON on 1425499169

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2015 5:50 pm
by Leisher
Speculation about where the Marvel films are going.

If he's right about the time gem, that would explain some of the scenes from the trailers.

Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2015 9:06 am
by Leisher
Marvel Marathon April 29th

This has some appeal to me. I'm sure it'd get a bit stale during slower moments, but such an event could be pretty cool if they did fun things with it.

Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2015 10:53 am
by GORDON
Leisher wrote:Marvel Marathon April 29th

This has some appeal to me. I'm sure it'd get a bit stale during slower moments, but such an event could be pretty cool if they did fun things with it.

I did the 12-hour Lord of the Rings marathon when I was 30, but a 27 hour Marvel marathon when I am 43 seems a bit out of my league.

That theater is going to STINK by the end.




Edited By GORDON on 1425570840

Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2015 12:46 pm
by Leisher
I was thinking that I could do the same marathon at home, at a slower pace, pay less for food, and know whose farts I'm smelling.

That's why I said they'd have to do fun things to make it worth while.

Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2015 1:03 pm
by TheCatt
My wife and I did an at-home marathon before The Avengers, watching most of the other movies, 1-2 nights / movie. It was pretty awesome.

Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2015 6:42 am
by Vince
GORDON wrote:
Leisher wrote:Marvel Marathon April 29th

This has some appeal to me. I'm sure it'd get a bit stale during slower moments, but such an event could be pretty cool if they did fun things with it.
I did the 12-hour Lord of the Rings marathon when I was 30, but a 27 hour Marvel marathon when I am 43 seems a bit out of my league.

That theater is going to STINK by the end.
Good times!

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 3:55 pm
by Leisher
Whedon has been hinting about other folks appearing in the movie.

This might be one of them.

Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2015 12:24 pm
by Leisher
What if the Avengers had been made in 1995.

It's all speculation, but they're probably right with a few of those castings, although the roles might be wrong.

Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2015 9:45 am
by GORDON
Here's the extended scene of them Avengers just chillin and trying to "pick up Thor's hammer," which is how they would say it in the porn movie.

But seriously, don't watch this. Seems like the entire movie has already been released in 90 second clips.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ou4yoD-9wL8

Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 1:36 pm
by Leisher

Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 9:08 pm
by thibodeaux
Leisher wrote:What if the Avengers had been made in 1995.

It's all speculation, but they're probably right with a few of those castings, although the roles might be wrong.
That would have been awesome.

Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 9:24 pm
by GORDON
The only one better than Eastwood as Nick Fury would have been Charlton Heston.

Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 11:20 pm
by Malcolm
GORDON wrote:The only one better than Eastwood as Nick Fury would have been Charlton Heston.
Lee Marvin.

Posted: Wed Apr 29, 2015 1:13 pm
by Vince
Okay, reading that Phil Coulson will still be dead as far as the movies are concerned. Because they don't want the movie goers to get confused or ticked off that they brought him back for Agents of SHIELD.

If they're going to keep all these moving parts isolated, what's the point? Doesn't bode well for any of the non-movie franchises (looking at you, Daredevil) having any impact or lasting meaning in the Marvel Universe.

Posted: Wed Apr 29, 2015 3:15 pm
by Leisher
Okay, reading that Phil Coulson will still be dead as far as the movies are concerned. Because they don't want the movie goers to get confused or ticked off that they brought him back for Agents of SHIELD.


Uhm...do they know anything about comics? At all?

Doesn't bode well for any of the non-movie franchises (looking at you, Daredevil) having any impact or lasting meaning in the Marvel Universe.


DD makes references to the Avengers and the Battle of New York. Also, it's already on record that DD will team up with Jessica Jones, Power Man (Luke Cage), and Iron Fist to form The Defenders and that'll be a movie. Rumors have them meeting the Avengers.

Also, DD is a street level guy. His impact is on Hell's Kitchen, not the world. That's a theme that gets talked about a lot in the comics.

Posted: Wed Apr 29, 2015 5:01 pm
by Vince
Leisher wrote:DD makes references to the Avengers and the Battle of New York. Also, it's already on record that DD will team up with Jessica Jones, Power Man (Luke Cage), and Iron Fist to form The Defenders and that'll be a movie. Rumors have them meeting the Avengers.
They refer to the movies in Agents of SHIELD all the time as well, but apparently things won't be reciprocated. They've just tempered my expectations a lot when I read about that.

Posted: Wed Apr 29, 2015 5:11 pm
by Malcolm
Uhm...do they know anything about comics? At all?

They probably don't want to deal with the (retro)continuity problems.

Posted: Wed Apr 29, 2015 7:11 pm
by GORDON
In the show Coulson told Lady Sif more than once to keep his being alive a secret, because he wanted to tell the Avengers in his own time. Is that no longer the thing? Have they completely branched the show out of the universe? Because I will not accept that.

Posted: Wed Apr 29, 2015 7:35 pm
by GORDON
“As far as I’m concerned, in this movie, Coulson’s dead. If you come back in the sequel and say Coulson’s alive, it’s like putting f***ing John Gielgud in the sequel to ‘Arthur.’ It mattered that he’s gone. It’s a different world now. And you have to run with that.”


Probably just wishful thinking on my part but it doesn't sound definitive... I think the reveal just won't happen in THIS movie. I bet it will be in Captain America: Civil War and it will give the Avengers a big reason to hate Nick Fury.