Page 26 of 94

Today in racism

Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 10:22 pm
by Cakedaddy
Leisher wrote: I did not rename white privilege white guilt. I said the author has white guilt.
I don't see that. He's simply pointing out his white privilege. That's why I feel like you are renaming it. Why does "Here's my family history and how we benefited from being white" become "I feel bad and we all owe black people stuff"? I think you can believe in white privilege while also not having white guilt. Any time white privilege comes up, you call it white guilt and quote Morgan Freeman and Bill Cosby. They make EXCELLENT points. Giving people an excuse why they don't have much, just gives them an excuse to not work for it. But that doesn't translate to no such thing as white privilege. Also, no one is saying white privilege is the ONLY problem. There are many, millions, of problems. Hell, white privilege may not even be one of them. It's simply a result of many of the problems. So, I'm not calling you racist, or ignorant. But you do seem to have an issue with acknowledging the existence of white privilege.

I was also kind of surprised you support BLM. I'm not sure I do. I do NOT think that the police as a whole are targeting, and killing, black people at will. I do not support applying the acts of a few to the group as a whole. I find it ironic that the BLM movement is doing exactly that. Would that be. . . . carreerist? A few people in this career are bad, so all people in this career are bad. Since when is it ok to assume that a few bad apples mean the entire group is bad?

Gordon on the other hand, my take on you is: I didn't do it, so it's not my problem. Also, black parents are single meth heads and/or loot Targets. Unless you can tell me exactly how to fix everything in a very detailed and easy to understand way, then I'll simply assume you want me to flog myself as penance. All this while saying "whites have had an advantage" that you then counter with looting and how they treat each other? It's actually hard to have a discussion with you.
I had more typed. . . but it got LOOONG because you concede point A, but then counter with point B, C, and then a far off point we'll call 1. It was hard to stay on point, and be brief.

For instance: "Fix what. Be specific".
"Inner city school are shit."
"Their parents are meth heads and the kids don't want to learn".

Where do we go from here? Explain how not all parents are meth heads? That some kids do want to learn? Are you arguing that we should simply do away with inner city schools and stop wasting money going through the motions? Should we find the good kids/parents, take the money that was spent on the schools and spend it beefing up housing/access to the good schools and get that good ones out? Or use that money to build a wall and keep all that filth contained and let them deal with themselves? Again, trying to figure out what you are trying to say, I end up on all kinds of tangents and hypotheticals.

Today in racism

Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 7:28 am
by TheCatt
I agree with Cake's first paragraph.
Cakedaddy wrote: I do not support applying the acts of a few to the group as a whole.
I agree here for the most part. The signs I've seen like "There's no such things as a good cop" etc at these rallies in my city are absurd. The doughnuts taunting, etc. It's retarded.

Gordon does not seem to like arguing any more.

Today in racism

Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 8:36 am
by Leisher
I'll respond later today Cake. I need to dig out of a mountain of work first.

Today in racism

Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 8:41 am
by TheCatt
Leisher wrote: I'll respond later today Cake. I need to dig out of a mountain of work first.
Work is the worst.

Today in racism

Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 8:56 am
by GORDON
inner city schools are broken, and it's not because of money. It's the society and a culture that holds zero value in succeeding, as well as a complete unwillingness to fix/remove the people making it impossible for anyone else to succeed. I never said anything about all black parents being methheads. If you think that's what I was actually saying, or believe, then there's nothing else to say. And I asked what the point of whining was, unless you're willing to discuss solutions, which no one is, aside from "cops and white people are bad, so bring on the floggers." Of course it's hard to argue with me, apparently you aren't getting the intent of what I'm saying.

Today in racism

Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 12:50 pm
by Cakedaddy
I would break it down into multiple parts. The schools NEED funding. Go tour one for proof. They are horrible. Move everything you love about your kid's school, but put it in one of their buildings with their supplies. You still wouldn't want your kid going there. They are run down, dirty, and I would argue dangerous. I THINK they've gotten all the asbestos out of them by now. They are extremely lacking in a lot of stuff, because they can't afford it. They can't compete with better schools, because they can't afford it.

Also, there is a major cultural problem. Many people (from the parents to the kids) don't take education seriously. It's horrible that kids that want to be there suffer because of the ones that don't. The distractions, the threats, etc. That needs to be fixed. Some parents are just bad parents. Some can't be good parents because they are too busy trying to feed them. The list goes on. LOTS of problems here too. All could use some fixin'. But I don't think there is a "complete unwillingness" to fix/remove the people making it impossible". I was there when there were 100's of volunteers working to improve Detroit schools. (That's how I was exposed) We were installing donated tech equipment, like overhead projectors and smart boards that were hand-me-downs from local businesses. NONE of it was new equipment. And we only installed around 10-15 of them. So only a few classrooms got one. One thing I was very impressed with was the auto industries support. They had full functioning assembly robots in some of the labs. A few different ones. Super cool and a VERY valuable skills. All donated by the auto industry. There were a TON of kids/parents there, working with the teachers. Painting rooms, helping guide visitor/volunteers to where they needed to go, and other general, light maintenance. There were a LOT of students/parents/teachers there that day showing they care and WANT change. I REALLY felt bad for them. So evidence of NOT a "complete unwillingness". There are people there that want and need help. But they can't do it with what they have. They need help/more.

When you summed up your 'schools don't deserve funding' argument with 'Chromebooks don't fix meth heads'. I got the impression that was your impression of life in the inner city. You didn't say 'some' or anything. You said " New chromebooks wont fix the methhead single parent household that doesn't have any food in it." Where that is true. It's not a solid representation of the inner city family.

There are a LOT of kids that want out of there. There HAS to be something that can be done to help them. And it's probably going to cost some money. Funding the schools WILL help them. I would also bet that better funded schools will help push some of the kids in the middle, further to the "I want to learn" side. A lot of kids would be in the "Everything is so shitty and no one cares, why should I" camp. Not everyone has the ability to power through adversity day in/day out and come out on top. With a little help, they can become contributing members of society as well.

Don't ask how much, where it goes, and how to eliminate waste and make everything perfect. Because that's a whole nother set of issues that needs to be fixed. I would want the parents to manage the money because I don't trust the government officials to do it. Let the people that are most affected by the change, institute the change. Or something.

Today in racism

Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 1:05 pm
by GORDON
I didn't qualify "not all but some" because I didn't think it needed to be qualified. I don't actually believe 100% of inner city parents are meth heads. But you stated what I was implying, that the ones who don't want to be there fuck things up for the kids who do.

I do not believe that technology teaches children, good teachers do. Smart boards are nice, and pretty, but chalkboards worked just fine for at least a century, and they don't require a laptop and working network to operate.

Until school boards are willing to boot the bad kids without getting sued, and switch their focus from "getting state funding" to "educating children," then you are going to have shit classrooms. If you have shit classrooms, you're going to have to bribe teachers to work there with student loan forgiveness, and they're going to do their time and bolt as soon as they can. Source
Buie, a mother of two, spent a year studying for a career she hoped would make a difference in children's lives.

She lasted exactly 62 days with the Chicago Public Schools.

"I was shell-shocked. I literally felt like I had been in a war," said Buie, who never returned to teaching after walking out of her classroom in fall 2000. "I had children who were dirty and hungry and bouncing off the walls. The administrators were inaccessible, and I just felt powerless. I loved the children, but there were so few opportunities to teach."

A study to be released Monday by a Chicago activist group suggests there are a lot of Alicia Buies out there.
Source

Smart boards don't fix this. Buildings falling apart need to be addressed, but overall, funding/tech is not why kids do not learn in bad schools.
Though the study didn't explore the reasons fueling the turnover, a 2003 survey of Chicago teachers echoed some of the same issues that drove Buie from the profession: unsympathetic administrators, disruptive students and uninvolved parents.
Exactly as I said.

Today in racism

Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 1:52 pm
by TheCatt
GORDON wrote: I do not believe that technology teaches children, good teachers do.
Honestly, for a lot of things, kids could teach themselves with the proper setup. My daughter taught herself a year of math with a Chromebook, because she wanted to know it. Her teacher wouldn't do shit.

Today in racism

Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 2:33 pm
by Cakedaddy
Technology makes teaching easier. Also, exposing kids to tech that is used in the real world has value. You can teach with a stick drawing in sand and the kids carrying chalk boards. But we've evolved and found even better ways to teach. If your school announced:

"In an effort to make our school more accessible and to save money, we are going to cut all tech funding and remove any tech that will cost money to maintain. This will allow us to lower our student fees. The tech isn't really needed, so lets all save some money."

Would you be happy?

Today in racism

Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 2:38 pm
by GORDON
I wouldn't be furious. A motivated kid will learn with a teacher on a chalkboard, or alone with a chromebook and good parental guidance. But to point at a failing inner city school and say, "The problem is not enough iPads" is never going to fix what's really wrong, there. It literally makes things worse by passing off the problems for another year.

Today in racism

Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 2:41 pm
by Cakedaddy
Who does that? Who says that? "All inner city school problems will be solved by the Ipad". I don't think anyone has looked at the disaster that is the Detroit Public School System and said "We could fix all of this with Ipads".

I think it's more likely they said "Ipads would help".

Today in racism

Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 3:03 pm
by TheCatt
GORDON wrote: "The problem is not enough iPads"
No one's saying that.

They might be saying "providing technology resources with competent teachers in an integrated teaching program with broadband access at home and school" or something would help.

Today in racism

Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 3:05 pm
by GORDON
Just shorthand for the trend to think more tech fixes the problems in the schools we're discussing.

Today in racism

Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 3:13 pm
by GORDON
And to get back to my original supposition that everybody whines and no ones brings solutions, I know exactly how to fix the inner city schools. And it absolutely would never be allowed, because it involves a lot of voluntary, and involuntary, surrender of liberties. Under the current government and system, I submit it can't be fixed, because people still have the freedom to fail.

Today in racism

Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 3:27 pm
by TheCatt
GORDON wrote: Just shorthand for the trend to think more tech fixes the problems in the schools we're discussing.
You're very reductionist.

Today in racism

Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 3:34 pm
by GORDON
Ok. But you've got to drill down and identify problems, if you want to solve them. Otherwise it becomes this big, nebulous, "I don't know why I'm angry, and I don't know why I'm protesting, except something something fuck white people."

Today in racism

Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 9:01 pm
by Leisher
I'm going to type this up, but you need to read it. You can't skim. You are continually assigning me opinions that I don't have or telling me I'm doing things that I'm not doing. I have zero desire to keep rehashing things over and over because my position keeps getting told to me rather than accepted for where it actually exists. And I will grant you this: My position is not black and white, no pun intended.

Let me start with this, at no point, have I ever renamed white privilege to white guilt. I don't even know how one does that or if it's even possible since one is an advantage and the other is an emotion. I said he HAS white guilt, but NOT that he didn't have white privilege. There is a gigantic difference between those two things. (I know you're probably thinking, "But you did!". No I didn't. Go back and read it or just keep reading here as I'll be addressing it again.)

Also, I specifically said this:
Leisher wrote: This isn't saying white privilege doesn't exist because being white comes with certain expectations and naturally makes you more appealing to other people that look like you. (Something that is true of all races.)
Yet, here's the belief you give me:
But you do seem to have an issue with acknowledging the existence of white privilege.
Point being, if you're not going to read it, can we please end the conversation here? It takes too much time to type all this stuff out. Onto my defense!
He's simply pointing out his white privilege.
No, he's not, and I cannot stress this enough: My position is that he is not where he is today solely because of white privilege, which is what his article implies. That is simply a misguided opinion thanks to white guilt. Or maybe it's not white guilt? Maybe it's simply the lack of being able to see the overall picture, because to say one's entire life is thanks to a single...what do you even call it?...phenomenon is ridiculous. However, it does scream white guilt, in that, he's willing to accept that is the reason for his success rather than a myriad of other things. (Or if you prefer, the "key element" to his success.)
That's why I feel like you are renaming it.
Hopefully, by now you understand that I'm not. Seriously, you can disagree with me on the point I'm making if you like, but this is a ridiculous statement.
Why does "Here's my family history and how we benefited from being white" become "I feel bad and we all owe black people stuff"?
As I explained above, he took it farther than it should have gone. Here's where I see it in his own timeline (Although, I'm not pulling the article up again. I'm just trying to get this done.):
-His grandfather makes money pre-POC (and women) having rights. - White privilege
-His mom fucks her way into the family. - Nope, this is pussy privilege.
-Mom gets dumped, but gets enough money to buy a house in a nice suburb. - Nope, this is 100% about money and his mom's intelligence to not waste it.
-Nice suburb has mostly white people and good schools - Based on the era, this is undeniably white privilege.
-He works and studies very hard. - Nope, this is 100% due to his
-He meets people and might have gotten some chances - A mix of luck, skill, talent, personality, political leanings (realistically you can't leave that out of Hollywood jobs), definitely religion, and some other things. Is white privilege in there? Probably, but it's not the key factor.

That's two times where it mattered, one other where it probably did a bit, and the rest was up to him or his mom. Only one of the times it mattered during his own lifetime.

And you can factor in other scientifically proven things on top of that like good looking people and tall people also having privilege because people just naturally give them more. Or how about how people trust blonds less and think they're dumber? And this goes on forever. There's tons upon tons of experiments and research in this field proving people have so many cues that are read by other people about their trustworthiness and so on that it's folly to give all credit to one simple thing. And we haven't even touched on smell, and this is all before a single word gets spoken, which brings in a whole other set of bias and bigotry.

This is all why I said his heart was in the right place, but why the article overall did not sit well with me. Did he get an advantage or two thanks to being white? Sure, but it certainly didn't make him successful. If that were true all white people would be far above anyone of color.

White privilege exists, but it is not the power that is implied. I don't get mailers from the Cracker Institute, I don't get invited to White Privilege meetings, when I'm broke white people don't bust down my door to pay my bills, and so on. White people just happen to be more trusting/accepting of other white people. And guess what? That's not exclusive to white people! Black privilege exists. Every race/creed/sex/etc. has privilege when it comes to dealing with people who look/think like them. Science has proven that.

So ultimately, I get sick of hearing "white privilege" when a white person has any success. I get sick of hearing about how many advantages whitey has in this country, and like you even said, it's used as an excuse as to why someone else doesn't succeed. The fact that this is usually said to or in front of an audience of white people in the same social class lacks truth and awareness. I get sick of hearing how whitey rules the world. Whitey doesn't rule the world. Whitey is vastly outnumbered and whitey doesn't run most countries on the planet. Now if you limit it to the U.S., yes whitey has the power, mainly because whitey conquered the lands and makes up the majority of people living here.

So that's my stance. It's why "white privilege" irks me so much. Of course it exists, but it's grossly overhyped and it ignores SO MANY other things.
Cakedaddy wrote: I was also kind of surprised you support BLM.
I don't, but I do support the current protests. NOT the riots, which is something I've gotten into an argument with a far left family member that is also trans. (Not important, but it's an interesting tidbit, so why leave it out?) I do think black people have to face injustice due to their skin color, but I also don't think it's a majority of cops. I think it's a small number, but departments should be doing more to weed out these bad apples.

But yes, I do find most of the people, particularly the most vocal, to be insanely hypocritical and ignorant. Most have no concept of what it means to sacrifice. What people did and do so that they can scream their ignorance from the rooftops. And so on.

Anyway, here's some other stuff I found last night before I got insanely busy today...

Speaking of hypocrisy:
Image

Two men caught with gas and a lighter behind a chief of police's house.

Same mentality as when soldiers came back from Nam and got spit on.

This one is a bit...I don't know, but it is true, so it works:
Image

Minneapolis city council working to disband police force and create new community police types that will only talk.

I truly hope this happens so we can watch the shit show that occurs.

No idea if this is real, but a cop I know posted this message from a black cop about the racism he faces from his own community:
I remember the countless times I canvassed the area afterwards, and asked everyone “did you see who did it”, and the popular response from the very same family members was always, “Fuck the Police, I aint no snitch, I’m gonna take care of this myself. This happened every single time, every single homicide, black on black, and then my realization became clearer.
I woke up every morning, put my freshly pressed uniform on, shined my badge, functioned checked my weapon, kissed my wife and kid, and waited for my wife to say the same thing she always does before I leave, “Make sure you come back home to us”. I always replied, “I will”, but the truth was I was never sure if I would. I almost lost my life on this job, and every call, every stop, every moment that I had this uniform on, was another possibility for me to almost lose my life again. I was a target in the very community I swore to protect, the very community I wanted to help. As a matter of fact, they hated my very presence. They called me “Uncle Tom”, and “wanna be white boy”, and I couldn’t understand why. My own fellow black men and women attacking me, wishing for my death, wishing for the death of my family. I was so confused, so torn, I couldn’t understand why my own black people would turn against me, when every time they called …I was there. Every time someone died….I was there. Every time they were going through one of the worst moments in their lives…I was there. So why was I the enemy? I dove deep into that question…Why was I the enemy? Then my realization became clearer.
Complaint: Police always targeting us, they always messing with the black man.
Fact: A city where the majority of citizens are black (Baltimore for example) …will ALWAYS have a higher rate of black people getting arrested, it will ALWAYS have a higher rate of blacks getting stopped, and will ALWAYS have a higher rate of blacks getting killed, and the reason why is because a city with those characteristics will ALWAYS have a higher rate of blacks committing crime. The statistics will follow the same trend for Asians if you go to China, for Hispanics if you go to Puerto Rico, for whites if you go to Russia, and the list goes on. It’s called Demographics
Complaint: More black people get arrested than white boys.
Fact: Black People commit a grossly disproportionate amount of crime. Data from the FBI shows that Nationwide, Blacks committed 5,173 homicides in 2014, whites committed 4,367. Chicago’s death toll is almost equal to that of both wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, combined. Chicago’s death toll from 2001–November, 26 2015 stands at 7,401. The combined total deaths during Operation Iraqi Freedom (2003-2015: 4,815) and Operation Enduring Freedom/Afghanistan (2001-2015: 3,506), total 8,321.
Complaint: Blacks are the only ones getting killed by police, or they are killed more.
Fact: As of July 2016, the breakdown of the number of US Citizens killed by Police this year is, 238 White people killed, 123 Black people killed, 79 Hispanics, 69 other/or unknown race.
Fact: Black people kill more other blacks than Police do, and there are only protest and outrage when a cop kills a black man. University of Toledo criminologist Dr. Richard R. Johnson examined the latest crime data from the FBI’s Supplementary Homicide Reports and Centers for Disease Control and found that an average of 4,472 black men were killed by other black men annually between Jan. 1, 2009, and Dec. 31, 2012. Professor Johnson’s research further concluded that 112 black men died from both justified and unjustified police-involved killings annually during this same period.
Complaint: Well we already doing a good job of killing ourselves, we don’t need the Police to do it. Besides they should know better.
The more I listened, the more I realized. The more I researched, the more I realized. I would ask questions, and would only get emotional responses & inferences based on no facts at all. The more killing I saw, the more tragedy, the more savagery, the more violence, the more loss of life of a black man at the hands of another black man….the more I realized.
I haven’t slept well in the past few nights. Heartbreak weighs me down, rage flows through my veins, and tears fills my eyes. I watched my fellow officers assassinated on live television, and the images of them laying on the ground are seared into my brain forever. I couldn’t help but wonder if it had been me, a black man, a black cop, on TV, assassinated, laying on the ground dead,..would my friends and family still think black lives mattered? Would my life have mattered? Would they make t-shirts in remembrance of me? Would they go on tv and protest violence? Would they even make a Facebook post, or share a post in reference to my death?
I realized that they refuse to believe that most cops acknowledge that there are Bad cops who should have never been given a badge & gun, who are chicken shit and will shoot a cockroach if it crawls at them too fast, who never worked in the hood and may be intimidated. That most cops dread the thought of having to shoot someone, and never see the turmoil and mental anguish that a cop goes through after having to kill someone to save his own life. Instead they believe that we are all blood thirsty killers, because the media says so, even though the numbers prove otherwise. I realize that they truly feel as if the death of cops will help people realize the false narrative that Black Lives Matter, when all it will do is take their movement two steps backwards and label them domestic terrorist. I realized that some of these people, who say Black Lives Matter, are full of hate and racism. Hate for cops, because of the false narrative that more black people are targeted and killed. Racism against white people, for a tragedy that began 100’s of years ago, when most of the white people today weren’t even born yet. I realized that some in the African-American community’s idea of “Justice” is the prosecution of ANY and EVERY cop or white man that kills or is believed to have killed a black man, no matter what the circumstances are. I realized the African American community refuses to look within to solve its major issues, and instead makes excuses and looks outside for solutions. I realized that a lot of people in the African American lead with hate, instead of love. Division instead of Unity. Turmoil and rioting, instead of Peace. I realized that they have become the very entity that they claim they are fighting against.
I realized that the very reasons I became a cop, are the very reasons my own people hate me, and now in this toxic hateful racially charged political climate, I am now more likely to die,… and it is still hard for me to understand…. to this day.
Officer Stalien
I hope this one works. It's a former gang banger speaking his truth about BLM:
https://www.facebook.com/kashlee.kelly/videos/554536008770728/

Image

Today in racism

Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 9:47 pm
by TheCatt
I really do think protestors could stop verbally harassing police. That’d be nice.

Today in racism

Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 10:19 pm
by Leisher
No argument.

Maybe they can stop judging people by the color of their clothes?

Today in racism

Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2020 3:05 pm
by Leisher
We've got a potential "news worthy" story brewing locally.

A year ago, a local gun store owner got elected to the school board and made news with offensive FB posts.

Now most of the community is rallying to get him removed, but nobody locally has the power to do so, thus they're petitioning Governor Whitmer to remove him.

My wife shared a post with examples and the link to the petition.