Page 250 of 434
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2015 8:57 pm
by TheCatt
Hmm, the board is just translating it to an IMG tag, at which point, I'd agree, that should just be a function of the browser... but it's fail.
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2015 9:01 pm
by TheCatt
<object style="width: 718px; height: 404px" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"
data="//s.imgur.com/include/flash/gifplayer.swf?imgur_video=">
<param name="movie" value="//s.imgur.com/include/flash/gifplayer.swf?imgur_video=" />
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="never" />
<param name="flashvars" value="height=404&width=718" />
<param name="width" value="718" />
<param name="height" value="404" />
<param name="version" value="0" />
<param name="scale" value="scale" />
<param name="salign" value="tl" />
<param name="wmode" value="opaque" />
</object>
Edited By TheCatt on 1429664669
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2015 9:05 pm
by TheCatt
OK, the problem is that it's not really a GIF at all. It's a video format.
But if you go to the url, and then right-click view source, you can grab the object HTML to make it work.
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 12:09 am
by Paul
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 4:23 pm
by Paul
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 8:30 pm
by TheCatt
I'm still in denial that stormtroopers aren't robots.
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 8:59 pm
by TPRJones
What?
If they were robots how could Luke and Han have stolen their outfits in the first movie?
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 9:01 pm
by TheCatt
TPRJones wrote:What?
If they were robots how could Luke and Han have stolen their outfits in the first movie?
You know how old I was when I saw that?
And if they WEREN'T robots, why did they need OIL? 
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 10:51 pm
by Malcolm
The suits were really tight. They needed something to help get into them.
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2015 7:21 am
by thibodeaux
Malcolm wrote:The suits were really tight. They needed something to help get into them.
Talcum?
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2015 7:38 am
by Paul
TheCatt wrote:I'm still in denial that stormtroopers aren't robots.
I remember as a kid I couldn't figure out what they were. Did Luke & Solo just take the shells off robots?
Yeah, I leaned toward robots too.
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2015 7:38 am
by Paul
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2015 10:39 am
by Paul
This is pretty much true for me.
Butts can be bad.
Amy Schumer had a song that doesn't quite extort the virtues of butts on her season premier.
One school posts questions asked to their preschoolers every week:
Edited By Paul on 1429801216
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2015 11:17 am
by GORDON
I beat you to it in the Smart Toilet thread.
You just got powned, son.
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2015 4:41 pm
by Paul
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2015 5:21 pm
by TPRJones
Paul wrote:I don't know if you misspelled pwned to be funny or not.
It's more funny if it wasn't on purpose.
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2015 5:26 pm
by GORDON
Paul wrote:GORDON wrote:
I beat you to it in the Smart Toilet thread.
You just got powned, son.
I don't know if you misspelled pwned to be funny or not.
I am evolving the word. I think I am going to settle on "poned" for the Oxford Dictionary word of the year. Possibly "poaned."
And if you don't like it, then I say "whateverest," which is the biggest amount of "whatever" on Earth. I also made that up.
I played with that for about 3 days when I first got a TV that had it, then ultimately got over the novelty of it and set it properly.
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2015 6:01 pm
by Alhazad
GORDON wrote:I think I am going to settle on "poned" for the Oxford Dictionary word of the year.
This has a good chance of happening, though more for My Little Pony-related reasons than you might like.
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2015 6:02 pm
by GORDON
I........
Ponied? Is poned already a thing?
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2015 6:06 pm
by TPRJones
Is it, like ... boning a pony? poning?
Ick.
