Page 23 of 71

Re: The Republican Party

Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 1:37 pm
by Malcolm
A portrait in lunacy.

Dumb-ass numero uno.
Sen. Kelly Ayotte has often found herself in a familiar spot with Donald Trump: Keeping her distance.

But in this fiercely independent state, Ayotte is gambling that voters might reward her for rebuking her own party's nominee. She has criticized Trump and will not endorse him -- yet still plans to vote for the billionaire in November.
You are a fucking mentally disturbed moron. You won't endorse him but you'll vote for him? I hope you get destroyed in your upcoming election you fucking duplicitous bitch.

Dumb-ass numero dos.
Florida Sen. Marco Rubio is standing by his description of Donald Trump as "a con artist," but he says in a new interview he still plans to support the real estate mogul for president.
In the fuck? You're admitting you're voting for a con artist?

Re: The Republican Party

Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 1:40 pm
by GORDON
The money flows from the Party, the Party is All.

Re: The Republican Party

Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 2:51 pm
by TPRJones
You won't endorse him but you'll vote for him?
That part seems reasonable. I would think it would take more to convince someone to speak out and endorse a candidate than it would just to get a vote. People do things all the time that they wouldn't also go that step further and recommend other people do. For example I like to smoke, but I wouldn't endorse smoking and recommend others do so as well.

Re: The Republican Party

Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 7:18 pm
by Vince
TPRJones wrote:
You won't endorse him but you'll vote for him?
That part seems reasonable. I would think it would take more to convince someone to speak out and endorse a candidate than it would just to get a vote. People do things all the time that they wouldn't also go that step further and recommend other people do. For example I like to smoke, but I wouldn't endorse smoking and recommend others do so as well.
I agree. It's like what I've been saying. I understand voting for Trump because you are against Hillary. It's the early adopters from the primary I don't understand.

Re: The Republican Party

Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 5:52 pm
by Malcolm
Jabba the Hutt leads NJ in taking a shit on the first amendment.
It requires the New Jersey government to identify companies that support a boycott of Israel, raising fears that it would create a “blacklist” of institutions that back the growing Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions, or BDS, movement.

Under the new law, the State Investment Council, which manages more than $80 billion in pension assets, is legally obligated to divest from these blacklisted companies.
I'm positively shocked that the Trump-fellating runner-up for the job of runner-up prez is curtailing free speech.

Re: The Republican Party

Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 7:51 pm
by TPRJones
Yup. There's no wiggle room there. Totally illegal.

Re: The Republican Party

Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2016 6:51 pm
by Malcolm
It's a great day to be a corrupt politician. Yeah, it's a little redundant.
McDonnell's case centered around the question of what constitutes the scope of an "official action" under federal corruption law. He received gifts, money and loans from Jonnie R. Williams, the CEO of a Virginia-based company, the government said, in exchange for official acts seen as favorable to Williams and his business.
...
Writing for the Supreme Court, Chief Justice John Roberts set a clear definition of the term "official action" and how it can be used in corruption convictions.
"In sum, an 'official act' is a decision or action on a 'question, matter, cause, suit, proceeding or controversy," Roberts wrote. "Setting up a meeting, talking to another official, or organizing an event (or agreeing to do so) -- without more -- does not fit that definition of an official act."
In short, 9-0 the conviction is overturned and bribery is legal so long as you can prove: (i) the briber doesn't profit too much from it and (ii) the bribee doesn't do anything too out of the ordinary, it's all cool. Why is this interesting?
it sure looks as though Trump’s donation to Bondi was intended to achieve instant results, and it did just that. Scott Maxwell at the Orlando Sentinel lays out the story here: “One day, Bondi’s office told this newspaper it was reviewing complaints from Floridians who said they felt swindled by the Trump Institute affiliate of Trump University. Four days later, Trump’s foundation cut a $25,000 check to Bondi’s campaign committee. Then, after the check came in, her office decided not to take any action against Trump.”
Hmm. Surely there's a valid explanation for this.
The longer version goes this way: On Aug. 25, 2013, New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman filed a lawsuit on behalf of a class of plaintiffs alleging that Trump University and its affiliates were “sham for-profit colleges” that misled consumers about what they would get for their money.

Right around that time, as Bondi has admitted, she personally solicited a donation from Trump. In September 2013, Bondi “publicly announced she was considering joining a New York state probe of Trump University's activities.” Three days later, the Donald J. Trump Foundation, based in New York, made a $25,000 contribution to And Justice for All, a political group that backs Bondi. A few days later, Bondi announced that her office had declined to join the multistate suit or to bring suit in Florida. Six months later, in March 2014, Trump hosted a $150,000 fundraiser for Bondi at his Mar-a-Lago resort at cut-rate prices.
Wow. That's not even subtle. Is any of that shit an official act?

Re: The Republican Party

Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2016 12:55 pm
by Malcolm
Reality TV Party being their usual paragon of reason.
"I want us to be able to fight ideologically, mentally, spiritually, economically, so that we don’t have to do it physically,” Bevin said Saturday. “But that may, in fact, be the case."

He added, citing Thomas Jefferson's "blood of patriots and tyrants" quote: "The roots of the tree of liberty are watered by what? The blood. Of who? The tyrants, to be sure. But who else? The patriots. Whose blood will be shed? It may be that of those in this room. It might be that of our children and grandchildren."
Christ on a fucking crutch.

Re: The Republican Party

Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2016 7:14 pm
by Malcolm
Cruz becomes one of the pod people.
"After many months of careful consideration, of prayer and searching my own conscience, I have decided that on Election Day, I will vote for the Republican nominee, Donald Trump," he wrote in a Facebook post.
Go fuck yourself, Ted.

Re: The Republican Party

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 12:58 pm
by Malcolm
Newt's reasoning:
“You don’t have to run around and defend Donald Trump. That’s his job,” he said. “You also don’t have to abandon him. There is no alternative at a practical level. He is the nominee.”
To paraphrase Bill Maher's line from a few days ago, "Fuck you, Republicans. You handcuffed yourself to this dead hooker and now you have to drag her across the finish line. Fucking learn next time."

Here's Newt channeling Helen Lovejoy.
“I think to sit on your hands, to find some pretense because Donald Trump is not pure enough, so you’re willing to have Hillary Clinton get elected, is an enormous disservice to the future of the country and to the future of our children and grandchildren,” he added.
How fucked is the Reality TV Party? I'm being forced to agree with Glenn Beck.
"It is not acceptable to ask a moral, dignified man to cast his vote to help elect an immoral man who is absent decency or dignity," Beck wrote on Facebook in reference to Trump. "If the consequence of standing against Trump and for principles is indeed the election of Hillary Clinton, so be it. At least it is a moral, ethical choice."

Re: The Republican Party

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 2:02 pm
by Leisher
"If the consequence of standing against Trump and for principles is indeed the election of Hillary Clinton, so be it. At least it is a moral, ethical choice."
If you agree with that, then you're both idiots.

Electing a known corrupt politician with zero ethics is NOT a good alternative to electing a nutjob.

Voting for the Libertarian is...

Re: The Republican Party

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 2:11 pm
by Malcolm
I'm not electing anyone. The insane 90-something percent of the voting public that's giving their stamp of approval to one of the two major candidates is doing all the electing.

Re: The Republican Party

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 3:17 pm
by Leisher
“The price of apathy towards public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.”


― Plato

Re: The Republican Party

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 3:18 pm
by Malcolm
I'm not apathetic. I'm doing the only thing my conscience will allow. And Plato was a pissy bitch who went on a twitter rant against Athens after espousing his beliefs in aristocratic oligarchs who should rule over society. Fuck him.

Re: The Republican Party

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 3:31 pm
by TPRJones
Not voting is not apathy. Apathy is not giving a shit. Clearly, shits are given.

Re: The Republican Party

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 3:35 pm
by Leisher
“Elections belong to the people. It's their decision. If they decide to turn their back on the fire and burn their behinds, then they will just have to sit on their blisters.”
― Abraham Lincoln
Not voting is not apathy. Apathy is not giving a shit. Clearly, shits are given.
I truly believe you care. Just not enough to go vote or do something to change a system you feel is broken.

Re: The Republican Party

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 3:40 pm
by Troy
The internal order which we created among the German people offered the conditions necessary to reorganize the army and also made it possible for me to throw off those shackles which we felt to be the deepest disgrace ever branded on a people.
- Hitler, 1937

It is so nice that the shackles have been taken off me and I can now fight for America the way I want to.
- Trump tweeting, this morning


The final solution approaches. The four horsemen ride again.

Re: The Republican Party

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 3:40 pm
by Malcolm
Leisher wrote:
“Elections belong to the people. It's their decision. If they decide to turn their back on the fire and burn their behinds, then they will just have to sit on their blisters.”
― Abraham Lincoln
The fire is fed every time someone walks in to vote and thinks it matters. "You can have warmed over shit from last night or fresh shit from this morning." WOOHOO freedom! And WOOHOO voting for Gary Johnson, who's going to get exactly zero electoral votes this year. In fact, I don't know if he'll be above 5% by the time the election rolls around. If you think things are polarized now, wait another three weeks. When the vast majority of people vote not because they like one candidate but because they hate another, I refuse to play that game of polite political hate-fucking. Voting for either of these puss-filled cysts of pod people would be distasteful and give me the overwhelming urge to punch every mirror I look into and use the shards to slash my own wrists and neck. This must be how Evo Shandor got started. I suppose I find Hillary professionally worse. But Trump is personally shittier.

Re: The Republican Party

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 3:48 pm
by Troy
Damn I put my quotes in the wrong thread.

Re: The Republican Party

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 3:49 pm
by TPRJones
I truly believe you care. Just not enough to go vote or do something to change a system you feel is broken.
I care enough to vote for a good candidate. We do not have a good candidate. I am unwilling to vote for shit candidates. I used to like Johnson, but it turns out he really does have no knowledge of foreign affairs to the point where he really isn't qualified to be President.

The only other thing I can think of to do involves becoming one of those mass shooters you see in the news, and I have no inclination to do that.