NFL
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2026 12:32 pm
Dolphins release Hill.
$1 says the Steelers come calling to try and help them lure Rodgers back.
$1 says the Steelers come calling to try and help them lure Rodgers back.
Not for nothing, but firing the HC in favor of entitled players usually doesn't pan out. Also, those numbers don't exactly translate to "I want to win" for Jackson. You think Brady missed OTAs?The Ravens' offseason program will begin on April 6 -- which was mentioned Wednesday by both Doyle (NOTE - their new OC) and Ravens coach Jesse Minter -- and their on-field workouts will start in May. Jackson has typically skipped most of the voluntary workouts and didn't attend eight of the nine on-field practices last spring.
During Wednesday's introductory news conference, Doyle was asked about his expectations for the attendance of all players this spring.
"We would expect them to be here and certainly it is voluntary," Doyle said. "But also, if you want to say that you're going to win a championship, you want to say that you have championship standards and those are your goals and your expectations, certainly that's going to take work. That's going to take collaboration, that's going to take the beginning of building the relationship with their coaches [and] other players, starting off this next regime on the right foot."
That's one huge number. How does it work? The Chiefs converted a huge portion of Mahomes' number to a signing bonus, which reduced their salary cap hit this year, but I'm pretty sure it gets applied later. If the Ravens do the same, are they just "borrowing from Peter to pay Paul"? Point being, are they spending now and pushing their salary cap hell for when their team is no longer competitive?The Ravens' biggest offseason priority is to reduce Jackson's $74.5 million salary cap number, which is the second highest in the NFL. Ravens owner Steve Bisciotti recently said the team wants to get a new deal done with Jackson by the start of free agency in the middle of March. Whether Baltimore can get a new contract with Jackson could impact his availability this spring.
An opinion I agree with and it's not just the NFL.
Still is afaik. Until 2035!
They [The Dodgers] have led MLB in attendance in each of the past 12 full seasons. They earn more sponsorship revenue than any of their peers, thanks largely to Ohtani’s unrivaled popularity in the U.S. and Japan. And at a time when the cable television business is collapsing in many markets, the Dodgers have a blockbuster TV deal that will pay them more than $330 million a year through 2038.
Put it all together, and the modern Dodgers have found a way to make the Evil Empire Yankees look downright destitute. Even the Mets’ Steve Cohen, the wealthiest owner in baseball, hasn’t been able to keep up with Los Angeles and failed to bring Tucker to Queens.
...
The solution could be a salary cap in a sport that has never had any hard limits on how much teams can spend on talent. The players’ union blames other owners for refusing to spend like the Dodgers and has maintained that it won’t agree to a salary cap under any circumstance, raising the specter of a protracted showdown.

I think the owners suck in this argument. The NFLPA should absolutely do these surveys, at least for their players. It makes a lot of sense. Even if they can't be "released publicly"Leisher wrote: ↑Thu Feb 26, 2026 4:26 pm Steelers are dead last in the latest player survey.
Shocking that all the cheap owners who don't invest in their facilities complained about this survey.