Welcome to Thunderdome

Gee, I wonder why the MSM hasn't covered this more...

The man is currently ranked #673.

I mean, he's not wrong!

No lies detected.

Can I wrestle some of those women?

You know, that's one thing I know I'm not turned on by: giants.

The taller, wider, and/or more muscular they get, the less I'm interested.

I didn't watch the whole thing, but a couple looked promising

Women used to be the main character, but feminism convinced them they weren't.
And in the name of equality, here's another video containing truth:

1 - She's wrong, and she doesn't really want to do that. Like the 1950s aren't even real. They were a post-WW2 anomaly. And marital rape was legal, abuse was more common, etc, etc.

2 - Men are hunters, not shoppers!

I have a response to this, but want to give myself time. I think it's a very interesting conversation that plays into bigger issues with our society. Way too busy today to dive into it. Would you even want to discuss? If not, I'll save myself the time and just say, "Well, you're wrong." (About #1, not #2.)

Leisher wrote: ↑Tue Feb 03, 2026 12:24 pm Would you even want to discuss? If not, I'll save myself the time and just say, "Well, you're wrong." (About #1, not #2.)

Sure. Today's not a good day for it, but tomorrow or Thursday

Sure. I think it'll be a fun one.

Two men talking about what's good for women!

Leisher wrote: ↑Tue Feb 03, 2026 1:23 pm Sure. I think it'll be a fun one.

Two men talking about what's good for women!

as it should be!

Not my post yet, but oddly, this popped up in my feed last night (I follow Stossel) and happens to hit on this very topic.

I haven't seen Stossel in a long time. I agree there are differences, I think it's pretty clear. But there are feminine men, masculine women, etc. Various shades of grey. I guess I reject the black/white ness. If a woman wants to be a SAHM, sure, great. My wife mentioned that that was her goal on our very first date, and I was like "hell yeah." If they want to work instead, go for it. I think the woman in that video says a lot of things, but we need to understand that they are tendencies and not absolutes.

I was reading a reddit thread today. A MF couples in their 20s invited a woman in for a threesome. 3 paragraphs later, the F (poster) mentions that the woman was a trans-woman. Then says her partner (M) got upset when he dipped out for a bit, then found out the trans-woman was fucking the F (not post-op, still had a penis).

Yeah. That's not an FMF threesome.

TheCatt wrote: ↑Wed Feb 04, 2026 10:50 am If a woman wants to be a SAHM, sure, great. My wife mentioned that that was her goal on our very first date, and I was like "hell yeah." If they want to work instead, go for it.

Spoiler: 100% in line with my feelings on the subject.

I searched and this doesn't seem to be a joke. This is how deluded the feminist movement have made modern women. I saw a woman a few months back on a clip from that one podcast that always has the OF models on, and she was adamant that women are physical equals to men, if not superior.

Yeah, it's insane to me that people think they're anywhere near each other in terms of capabilities.

A friend of mine, years ago, was like "Why do we have separate sex sports, why not just one combined league?" And I said "Women are already allowed to play in the 'mens' leagues, they just can't compete." And that was new information to him. (He was a smart person, had just never really thought of this. Also, he was not super athletic, but his wife was a farmer, and pretty strong).

I always tell my girls that men and women are not equal, but should be treated as equals. Women and men both have things that make them unique and "better" than the other, but also weaknesses that make them worse. It's why we're not all the same sex, because we're not the same and that's ok.

Women get multiple orgasms, a body that is worshipped, the ability to gestate a new life, a nurturing nature that men do not have, the ability to multitask far better than men, a higher pain tolerance, and so on.

Men are faster, stronger, logical thinkers, have threat detection that women don't have, can write our names in the snow, we have a curiosity and drive that women generally do not have, and so on.

Honestly, the feminist movement has been wrong since the beginning. Yes, anyone, regardless of sex, race, etc. should have the same opportunities as anyone else. However, no standards should ever be lowered. If you cannot meet the standards, you don't get the job. Sorry, not sorry. Charles Darwin says to kiss his ass. Also, they shouldn't have wanted the same jobs as men, they should have demanded positions where they excel get more reward and recognition. And before the joke is made, no I'm not talking about cook, dishwasher, etc.

For example:
-Teachers should be making a hell of a lot more money, but I'd also dramatically shift how their performance is measured. (Goodbye standardized testing.)
-Executive assistants should also be a highly paid job. I know the ones who work for the megacorps can be, but their contribution is very underrated. I have a 3 and a half person (one contractor) IT department in a small/medium sized company and we could absolutely use a full time assistant who is organized far better than three guys who constantly get pulled into different directions every time an email comes in or a phone rings.
-I fully believe SAHM (and Fs) should receive some financial incentive...IF they're in a marriage. (If they're single, that's a whole other conversation because of system abuse.)

I know those sound sexist to a feminist, but that's my point. Steer toward your strengths. If you had a child that happened to have dwarfism, but had a natural affinity to math, you'd be a fool to push them towards a career in the NBA. And again, that's not saying women cannot do other jobs or men can't be good at the examples above, but they are the exceptions, not the rule. All policies, laws, etc. should always be based on the rule, not the exceptions.