Random Images from Around the Web *NSFW*

Paul · Post by **Paul** » Fri May 30, 2014 7:07 am

Fans bring 10,000 flares to a soccer game

Twins!

Post by **TPRJones** » Fri May 30, 2014 11:40 am

This ... is brilliant!

Paul · Post by **Paul** » Fri May 30, 2014 12:08 pm

I think the bacon flavor would be diluted by the pancake.

It'd improve the pancakes, but not as much as it would detract from the bacon I was going to eat with the pancakes anyway.

Edited By Paul on 1401466190

Paul · Post by **Paul** » Fri May 30, 2014 1:36 pm

Crabeater seal skull:

*They do not eat crabs. They eat krill.

Whale shoots raibows!

Post by **Leisher** » Fri May 30, 2014 3:52 pm

Paul · Post by **Paul** » Fri May 30, 2014 9:53 pm

Leisher wrote:

True dat!
They are also way off in what equates an equal amount of blanket.

Post by **GORDON** » Sat May 31, 2014 12:49 am

Leisher wrote:

Reminds me of thing:

I know that the great majority of people are not child kidnappers. That is obvious. Way less than 1% of the population. But that doesn't mean I would ever let my 8yo kid take rides from strangers. It isn't a wrong to not be stupid and take precautions.

That being said, don't put yourself in dangerous situations, and don't let yourselves get fukkin raped, ladies. Idiots.

Paul · Post by **Paul** » Sat May 31, 2014 9:07 am

Teach "Don't kidnap" not "Don't take rides from strangers!"

Paul · Post by **Paul** » Sat May 31, 2014 9:46 am

Star Trek stabilized

Edited By Paul on 1401545373

Malcolm · Post by **Malcolm** » Sat May 31, 2014 1:50 pm

Picard: looks like he's having a slightly bumpy tea time on a train.
Riker: looks like he's riding a mechanical bronco.
Worf: looks like he's dancing uncomfortably in a shitty, overpriced club and just realized it.

Edited By Malcolm on 1401558713

Paul · Post by **Paul** » Sat May 31, 2014 11:08 pm

No mention of the guy in blue ejaculating onto the control panel?

Paul · Post by **Paul** » Sat May 31, 2014 11:10 pm

My head literally exploded when I saw how they are now defining "literally."

Paul · Post by **Paul** » Mon Jun 02, 2014 12:09 am

Malcolm · Post by **Malcolm** » Mon Jun 02, 2014 12:16 am

Is that their one funny bit for the year?

Post by **TPRJones** » Mon Jun 02, 2014 10:32 am

Paul wrote:My head literally exploded when I saw how they are now defining "literally."

Dictionaries don't define language, they catalog it. The usage has evolved enough that it's a done thing.

This is not the first time a word has changed meaning through popular misuse. It's not even the hundredth time.

Edited By TPRJones on 1401719554

Paul · Post by **Paul** » Mon Jun 02, 2014 12:20 pm

TPRJones wrote:This is not the first time a word has changed meaning through popular misuse. It's not even the hundredth time.

Yeah, but how often does a definition go from one meaning to also meaning the opposite.
"Literally" literally means "not literally."

Post by **TPRJones** » Mon Jun 02, 2014 12:55 pm

Paul wrote:Yeah, but how often does a definition go from one meaning to also meaning the opposite.

So often that there is a wordfor those sorts of words. Many of the contronyms that aren't true homographs formed in exactly the same way.

Paul · Post by **Paul** » Mon Jun 02, 2014 3:55 pm

TPRJones wrote:
Paul wrote:Yeah, but how often does a definition go from one meaning to also meaning the opposite.
So often that there is a wordfor those sorts of words. Many of the contronyms that aren't true homographs formed in exactly the same way.

Malcolm · Post by **Malcolm** » Mon Jun 02, 2014 5:44 pm

Goddamn English.

Post by **GORDON** » Mon Jun 02, 2014 6:02 pm

I refuse to ever compromise on this. I will forever mock those who use that word incorrectly.

Welcome to Thunderdome

Random Images from Around the Web NSFW